1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
snow_lady [41]
3 years ago
9

What part did James Madison and Alexander Hamilton play in debate over the U.S. Constitution?

History
2 answers:
Tema [17]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

A. They argued in support of ratification (acceptance) through political essays called The Federalist Papers.

Explanation:

Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, along with John Jay, were Federalists that strongly favored the ratification of the newly proposed U.S. Constitution. In order to gain support for its ratification, they wrote a series of 85 essays in 1787 that addressed constitutional principles and explained the deficiencies of the Articles of Confederation (the former U.S. Constitution) and the details of the new Constitution, arguing that its ratification would preserve the Union and empower the federal government to act firmly and coherently in the national interest. This collection of essays were known as <em>The Federalist Papers. </em>

LenaWriter [7]3 years ago
3 0

James Madison and Alexander Hamilton played an important part in the debate over the US Constitution because they argued in support of ratification (acceptance) through political essays called the Federalists Papers.

Further Explanation:

The <em>Federalist Papers </em>were a series of essays published anonymously during the era of the Constitutional Convention. It was later noted that James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay wrote these documents.

The goal of these essays was to convince American citizens that the new US Constitution being created to replace the Articles of Confederation needed a strong central government in order to be successful. These authors especially feared that if the central (aka federal) government was not strong enough, then the new constitution would fail just like the Articles of Confederation did.

However, these federalists faced backlash and protest from anti federalists. Anti federalists feared a strong central government for many reasons. Ultimately, the debate between these two sides helped to shape the creation of the US Constitution used today.

Learn More:

Comparison of Federalists and Anti Federalists- brainly.com/question/13064045

Key Details:

Topic: American History, Constitutional Convention

Grade Level: 7-12

Keywords: Federalist, Federalist Papers, Anti Federalists, Constitutional Convention, Articles of Confederation

You might be interested in
What were the consequences of the treaty of Versailles for Germany
Sophie [7]

The most severe punishment one group of countries has placed upon another.

France especially levied heavy reparations on Germany. This resulted in the ruining of the German economy, causing starvation and raising social and political unrest.

It is interesting that France actually started WW1. Austria Hungary was totally within it's rights as a sovereign Nation to act upon the uprising in Serbia. Deciding to declare war brought the world close to it's knees.

It's not surprising that the terms of the treaty of Versailles brought rise to National Socialism and Hitler through a populous movement.

In final analysis, the Treaty of Versailles was in essence a treaty designed to start WW2.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do the Russian people support putin,even though most don't agree with his actions?
ss7ja [257]
We humans often like stability. Russians know Putin (to a degree.) They knows what risks he poses to them and their country. If the had a new president they might not know a single thing about him.
5 0
3 years ago
Why did the federal budget deficit grow in the late 1960s??
NeTakaya
<span>It required the president to secure congressional approval for any substantial deployment of troops abroad.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
What was the "Dust Bowl" and what caused it?
Gekata [30.6K]

Answer:

The Dust Bowl was a period of severe dust storms that greatly damaged the ecology and agriculture of the American and Canadian prairies during the 1930s; severe drought and a failure to apply dryland farming methods to prevent the aeolian processes (wind erosion) caused the phenomenon.

Explanation:

I hope this helps and pls mark me brainliest :)

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is most likely the next step in the series?
Alekssandra [29.7K]

Answer:

D. Hexagon

Explanation:

Although we can never truly know the correct answer, we can look back in the series and predict.

First off, we have a triangle (3 sides), then we have a rectangle (4 sides), and finally we have a pentagon (5 sides). The is a clear staple this series is making: it is adding sides to each shape as the series progresses.

Plus, the other answers have 4 and 8 sides, so I knew it wasn’t those.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do historians keep track of time
    14·2 answers
  • One long-term effect on the Seneca falls convention was that it
    13·1 answer
  • What did Federalists and Anti-Federalists think of political corruption?
    15·1 answer
  • What were the first books mostly about
    11·1 answer
  • After the death of Sun Yat-sen, how did Chiang Kai-shen unify the Nationalist Party, or KMT?
    10·1 answer
  • Describe how thomas more <br> showed renaissance influences in their work
    10·1 answer
  • Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 2 points)
    8·2 answers
  • Justinian conquered all of the following areas EXCEPT:
    15·2 answers
  • To what extent did<br> the Portuguese and<br> Spanish change<br> trade patterns in<br> Afro-Eurasia?
    9·1 answer
  • Rural families in the 1920s could visit the child welfare special,a service run by the children’s bureau to provide healthcare ?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!