The correct answer is the fundamental attribution error.
The fundamental attribution error (FAE) refers to the phenomenon where people overestimate internal influences or factors that result in others' behavior, while underestimating external factors or influences that are outside a person's control when explaining their behavior. An instance of FAE is when a classmate fails an exam and you believe that it is because of factors internal to him or her (such as laziness, lack of ability and low intelligence) rather than external factors outside his or her control (family crises, illness, etc.).
Answer:
c. make the norms salient to participants.
Explanation:
Field experiment: In psychological research, the term "field experiment" is described as one of the different studies that utilize "experimental design" that happens in any natural setting. While conducting a field experiment, the experimenter tends to examine or analyze the degree to which the manipulation of a single independent variable causes a change or alteration in the given dependent variable related to the natural environment.
In the question above, the researchers suggest that the specific role of the given confederate in the mentioned study was to make the particular norms salient to participants as it is significantly described that participants will model the confederate's behavior i.e, they will get influenced.
Congress could then use a threat in jail for withholding evidence *but take it from someone else I'm not sure*
The first alternative is correct (A).
Large corporations are publicly traded, meaning that the company is divided into shares that are distributed in the financial market to investors. These investors, in turn, delegate a team of directors who make strategic decisions of the firm, theoretically independent. However, the directors make their decisions thinking about the profit that will pass to the owners of the companies' shares, to which they report.
This model, in a way, places the responsibility of business owners in the background. In the event of a lawsuit, the company is first investigated as well as its directors. In order to reach the owners, a more complex legal process is necessary.
A recent example: a mining company caused an environmental and human catastrophe in Brazil, destroying an ecosystem and killing hundreds of people. The shareholders were not held responsible, only the company as an institution is being processed. The board was fired, but the real owners of the company suffered nothing.
