According to Kuhn, the set of beliefs, values, assumptions, and a particular way of doing research which are accepted by a group of scientists is called paradigm.
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
1. Texting and driving is so unsafe. its almost as bad as drinking and driving!! you would kill a new family thus no thanks!
2. Im not to sure about this. i do not pay tax yet and my parents do all the legal stuff for me so as of now i dont have an opinion!
3. I understand and respect this, due to trials need to be fare so the person on the line gets what they deserve! with this it cuts down bi est opinions!!
4. Personal i hate that my parents control my life and if i could have my teenager way they would be there to Gide and support me for my choices. thinking in the real world i understand why its there and why its needed.
Answer:
I think September 17th 1999, when his book came out
Explanation:
Answer:
<em>Object Permanence</em>
Explanation:
Object permanence is used to <em>explain the tendency of an infant to recognize that objects still exist, although they can not be seen or heard any longer.</em>
Whenever an item gets hidden from sight, infants within a certain age are often get upset that the item has disappeared.
Jordan thinks that her pacifier has disappeared.
This is because they're too young to really understand that although the object can not be seen, it still exists.
