Answer:
The correct answer is a. buyers will go elsewhere.
Explanation:
This situation occurs when there is competition, that is, other businesses that offer the same or similar products as those of a particular company. In this scenario, the potential buyer will notice the difference according to their previous experiences and will find a way to acquire products from another brand that offer the same satisfaction as the product that rose in price. You must be very cautious with this practice, since it can end up damaging the operation, and in the worst case, leading to bankruptcy.
There are different and incompatible economic goals. (APEX Class ;)
Answer: conducted substantial business with Ohio residents through the Web site.
Explanation: The sliding - scale standard confirms when exercising jurisdiction over an out of state defendant is allowed. It is only allowed when significant business has been conducted by this out of state company over the Internet with another state. In this case the out of state defendant is Trading Post, a Washington company, and it has dealt in transactions over the Internet with the state of Ohio via its website. Because the business conducted in Ohio is significant, it gives Robert the grounds to sue Trading Post, even though Trading Post is not based in the same state as Robert.
Answer: It is more aggression than acquiescence. It is not a compromise between the two.
Explanation: