Answer: Unlimited liability
Explanation:
Unlimited liability is defined as being exposed to losses and risk without any boundlessly. As per the company agreements or guidelines , the person or business can face potential risk towards their assets.
According to the question,Jami would be liable in unlimited manner if his lost debit card is found and used by any unauthorized user. As Jami did not report the missing complain of his debit within 60 days he will be liable to face all the loss.
If he would have complained within 60 days then there were chances that he would be facing low losses upto $500 .He would not be liable to anything if he reported before charges application or his card might have been safe from unauthorized access.
The government is concerned by letting non native species in the non native species will take over the natural habitat of native species destroying the local environment and dwindling the population of native animals. Saying something along those lines would be good
In England, the king appointed judges and could remove them at will, so judges had strong incentives to issue rulings that pleased the king to keep their jobs.
The Framers of the Constitution instead wanted an independent judiciary able to act as a buffer against an oppressive legislature or executive. As Alexander Hamilton argued in Federalist 78, the Framers granted federal judges life tenure to protect them from undue political influence: “In a monarchy it is an excellent barrier to the despotism of the prince; in a republic it is a no less excellent barrier to the encroachments and oppressions of the representative body.”
Life tenure is intended to allow judges to issue rulings that go against the majority or ruling elite without fear of retribution. And these protections are necessary: Federal judges routinely rule on the most important and controversial issues of the day and consider whether state and federal laws are constitutional, raising claims of “countermajoritarian” behavior by scholars and politicians alike.
Public criticism of judicial decisions is also nothing new: Newly inaugurated President Thomas Jefferson vehemently derided the 1803 case Marbury v. Madison, perhaps the most consequential Supreme Court decision, which ultimately established the power of judicial review, or the ability of courts to strike down laws as unconstitutional. Jefferson even tried to block the court from ruling on the case by canceling the court’s June 1802 term.
President Barack Obama famously criticized the justices of the Supreme Court for their ruling in Citizens United v. FEC while they sat silently at the 2010 State of the Union.
<em>Hope it helps </em>
.... Pls mark brainliest
