It was a way for the sharecroppers to make some money, but they are always underpaid, and don't make enough to buy what they need, and only just barely scrape by. This makes the job as a sharecropper seem like their only choice.
it is false and disagreed that the large scale immigration into California during the 20th century was a direct result of the religious pluralism in America
Religious pluralism refers to practice where all citizen in a religiously diverse society has the rights and freedoms to worship according to their conscience.
The mass influx of Europeans and Asia into California was because of increased demand for unskilled workers by the factory owners.
In conclusion, it is false and disagreed that the large scale immigration into California during the 20th century was a direct result of the religious pluralism in America.
Read more about Religious pluralism
<em>brainly.com/question/4246879</em>
Because this was a period in which there was a great export of slaves, in addition to the fact that there were great discussions of white men and blacks still fighting for their total freedom.
In general, starting from the history of a large part of these peoples, we can say that there was domestic slavery in Africa, and not a commercial slavery, that is, among several African peoples, the slave was not a commodity, but an arm to more in harvesting, livestock, mining and hunting; an extra warrior in military campaigns.
These African peoples preferred women as slaves, since they were responsible for agriculture and could generate new members for the community. And many of the children born to slave mothers were considered free by the community. The vast majority of African peoples were matrilineal, that is, they organized themselves based on maternal ancestry, starting with the transmission of names and privileges from the mother. In this way, a slave mother could become a political leader in her society, having generated the heir to the local leadership.
In addition, a slave who was faithful to his master could occupy a position of local prestige, including owning his slaves. Thus, not always being a slave was a condition of humiliation and disrespect. Even representing a submission, it was a situation that was often the same as that of other free people.
The United States and the Japanese.
