1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
jenyasd209 [6]
4 years ago
13

In Festinger and Carlsmith's (1959) classic study on cognitive dissonance, participants who were paid $20 for doing a boring tas

k, in contrast to those who were paid $1 for doing the same task, __________.
Social Studies
1 answer:
marishachu [46]4 years ago
8 0

Answer:

In Festinger and Carlsmith's (1959) classic study on cognitive dissonance, participants who were paid $20 for doing a boring task, in contrast to those who were paid $1 for doing the same task, did not experience cognitive dissonance and rated the task as boring when alone.

Explanation:

<u>In Festinger and Carlsmith's study, participants were asked to do a boring task for an hour. Then, some of them were paid $1 while others were paid $20 to lie to someone else by telling that person the activity was fun and enjoyable.</u>

People who were paid only $1 later rated the task as fun, even though they no longer needed to lie. The reason for that is that they experienced <u>cognitive dissonance - a discomfort caused when our beliefs and our actions are not aligned</u>. They did a boring task, lied about it, and only got paid $1. In order to not feel uncomfortable about that fact, they would internalize the attitude they had been forced to express. In other words, they would convince themselves that the activity has indeed been fun.

<u>On the other hand, people who were paid $20 did not experience cognitive dissonance. The higher amount of money actually made lying worth their while. Later, when rating the task by themselves, they did not rate it as fun. They did not feel the need to convince themselves that the task was not boring. The money was reward enough.</u>

You might be interested in
Why do you think the path of appeal to the supreme court involves so many steps?
motikmotik
Because the Supreme Court doesn't have time to go over so many cases. So the steps thin the cases out to the most important ones.
4 0
4 years ago
Match the cause with the effect.
garik1379 [7]

1 E

2 A

3 B

4 c

5 d

or

4 d

5  c

7 0
4 years ago
God expresses his grace toward his what in general and toward blank in specific
Alisiya [41]

Answer:

Maybe Yes:)

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Which number on the map represents the capital of Georgia immediately BEFORE the capital became Atlanta? A) 2 B) 3 C) 4 D) 5
Vinvika [58]
The answer is going to be D) 5
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the strengths of transactional analysis​
cricket20 [7]
• increases self awareness
• allows for reflection
• opens up more effective communication
• helps people hold themselves accountable
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How does A/B Testing work?
    14·1 answer
  • Why did the British feal justified imposing the stamp act on the colonists
    5·1 answer
  • What was island hopping? Why was it effective?
    8·1 answer
  • The town of rock ridge has called together its residents to meet in the town hall to discuss and vote on its sales tax, thus exe
    15·1 answer
  • What is important to European countries during the age of exploration?
    11·1 answer
  • How old must one be to be elected to the U.S. senare
    11·2 answers
  • What is a manipulated variable
    10·1 answer
  • What was the main religious difference between the Separatists and ordinary Puritans?
    14·1 answer
  • The Bourbon Triumvirate was comprised of three men?
    7·2 answers
  • How do you pay taxes when you turn 18? How does that system thing work?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!