Answer: new york and British colony
Explanation:
Answer:
Scott was considered as property that could not be taken from its owner.
Explanation:
In the way this ruling was written, Dred Scott didn't have the right to sue in a Missouri's courts, since he wasn't considered a citizen.
Section C also basically states the the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and was considered void, as it deprived a US citizen of their property, which is what slaves were considered as at the time.
The child or childer by a slave woman is/are considered slave by birth. It was part of the <span>Virginia Slave Act of 1662 that states that all child of a slave women are considered slave for a lifetime. While the child of the free woman is always considered to be free. </span>
Answer:
They were played at 12 and 26 frames per second, played at a very wrong speed
Explanation:
They have received $210 million dollars
