1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Licemer1 [7]
3 years ago
12

How did u.s involvement in wwii affect african americans?

History
2 answers:
Anika [276]3 years ago
6 0

Italy intervened in the Spanish Civil War on the side of General Francisco Franco, annexed Albania in 1939. What angered nations the most was Italy’s conquest of Ethiopia because Mussolini sent an army of 250,000 soldiers armed with tanks, poison gas, artillery, and aircraft to conquer the Ethiopians who were unprepared. 275,000 Ethiopians lost their lives as a result.

Operation Barbarossa was Germany’s attack on the Soviet Union. Germany used similar tactics that were effective in Poland and Western Europe. However, the Germans underestimated the Soviet’s Red Army and these tactics were not effective in vast expanses of Russia. The Red Army also militarized 360 divisions versus Germany’s 150. Also, Germans were not prepared for Russia’s harsh winter conditions, which thousands died or underwent amputation due to frostbite. Overall, 800,000 German soldiers died in battle in Russia.

The Japanese hoped to destroy America’s navy in the Pacific with an attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. More than 350 bombers, fighters, and torpedo planes struck into two waves, which sank or disabled eighteen ships and two hundred aircrafts. Additionally, on December 11, 1941, Hitler and Mussolini declared war on the U.S.

Mila [183]3 years ago
5 0
<span>As for many Americans, the Second World War boosted the economic prospects of many African Americans. In particular, war industries created a demand for labor, which many black workers, including black women, were able to fill. Thousands of African Americans moved north to industrial centers, but also to places like California, which saw tremendous population growth during the war due to the war industries that developed there.</span>
You might be interested in
how did the popularity of unsafe at any speed affect the government policies regarding automobile production?
a_sh-v [17]

Answer:

It accused automakers of failing to make cars as safe as possible

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following examples shows the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic?
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

All of the choices are correct. The fact that Censors appointed, and could remove, senators;  Tribunes could veto laws; and Consuls were elected for one-year terms are examples of the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic.

Explanation:

The Roman Republic was a political regime with a highly original approach. A regime that, despite all its political intrigues, reached almost 500 years. Probably, one of the reasons why it lasted so long is because it was a carefully balanced system. In this regard, the Greek historian Polybius said that Rome had a mixed government, fruit of a process that he called anacyclosis. It is known as such, to the succession of a series of political systems due to its irremediable tendency towards degeneration. Consequently, Rome knew a monarchy that degenerated into tyranny, also an aristocracy that ended up being oligarchic, until finally it reached a system closer to democracy.

In this way, the Roman Republic could contain features of these three political systems, thus giving it, according to Polybius, a certain superiority. Why? Because the main elements of the republic, which embody each of the three systems, must cooperate so that it works. For example, for a war, the consul - monarchy - will need, both a resolution of the senate -aristocracy- for the sending of legions, and the approval of the people (in elections) -democracy-, since it is whoever annuls or ratifies the armistices and treaties. In addition, the Senate will also depend on the people, because it is the people who, after the deliberation of the Senate, must approve those procedures in which there are crimes against the State that are punished with the death penalty. Likewise, the people will need the Senate insofar as this chamber is fundamental to carry out the public works that are first executed through the management of the town.  

What does the description described so far mean? Simply, that we are before a forerunner of the system of checks and balances. The current one, coming from Locke and Montesquieu, proposes a division between executive, legislative and judicial. But its old equivalent did not distinguish between powers, but forced an interorganic cooperation. In this way, in order to carry out certain competences, it might be necessary for two or more bodies to collaborate, thus preventing any of them from acting in a despotic manner. Meanwhile, there is currently a division of competence according to which each body has established guidelines, and the key to avoid despotism is precisely the opposite: that none of them interfere in the competencies of others.

5 0
3 years ago
no people can be truly happy if they have liberty but no freedom… Religious profession and worship. Space this passage represent
skelet666 [1.2K]

William Penn and Roger Williams, that is the correct answer TRUST ME I TOOK THE QUIZ AND TE ANSWER BELOW ME IS WRONG!

6 0
3 years ago
What is Virginia had not seceded from the Union? Would this have affected the war? Why or Why not?
Ne4ueva [31]
Yes it would have because if Virginia had rejected secession, the prospect of Lee in command of Union forces rather than Confederate forces would have presented major problems for the Confederacy. The South would have lost a major economic and political asset, the state of West Virginia would never have been created, the war would almost certainly have been shorter. Interestingly, such circumstances might cast some doubts on how determined the North would have been to end slavery permanently.
Hope this helped!!
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Liu Bang defeat the Qin dynasty? Liu Bang defeated the Qin dynasty when the Yellow River flooded and caused a famine Liu
lilavasa [31]

Answer:

C. Liu Bang organized a rebellion due to the Legalist policies of the Qin Dynasty.

Explanation:

Got it right

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why wasn't South Carolina upset when part of her land was given to Georgia?
    7·2 answers
  • Before the Civil War began, which isssue played the GREATEST role in increasing tension and conflict between northern and southe
    13·2 answers
  • When was the Bill of Rights added to the United States Constitution
    11·2 answers
  • Answer Please will rate and more!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    11·1 answer
  • _____________ were made to legally discriminate against Jews in Germany.
    15·1 answer
  • Islamic dynasty that ruled India from the sixteenth through the eighteenth centuries; the construction of the Taj Mahal is repre
    5·2 answers
  • Why did the U.S. tariff on sugar in 1894 devastate the Cuban economy?
    12·1 answer
  • What advantages and disadvantages did the Continental Army have at the start of the American Revolution?
    6·1 answer
  • Where does Carnegie build his first steel plant?
    12·2 answers
  • According to jefferson, which of these is against god’s plan? punishing people for what they believe allowing people religious f
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!