1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ratelena [41]
3 years ago
15

In 2001, puerto rico enacted a law that requires specific labels on cement sold in puerto rico and imposes fines for any violati

ons of these requirements. the law prohibits the sale or distribution of cement manufactured outside puerto rico that does not carry a required label warning that the cement may not be used in government-financed construction projects. antilles cement corp., a puerto rican firm that imports foreign cement, filed a complaint in federal court, claiming that this law violated the dormant commerce clause. (the dormant commerce clause doctrine applies not only to commerce among the states and u.s. territories, but also to international commerce.) did the 2001 puerto rican law violate the dormant commerce clause
Business
1 answer:
Nataly_w [17]3 years ago
7 0

The Dormant Commerce Clause is not found in the Constitution, however, it allows the US federal government to regulate commerce within the states, US territories, and international commerce. Therefore, When any state law contrasts with the Commerce Clause, the dormant commerce clause takes effect. Now in this situation, Puerto Rico is restrained from enforcing any laws concerning commerce, since it is still under "US territories, the control to exercise such is left to the US government. So, based on this facts, I will say YES the Puerto Rican law broke the dormant commerce clause. Puerto Rico as a US territory does not have the power to regulate the cement labels because this law concerns commerce.

You might be interested in
One of Justin's largest international customers is Alpine Airwaves in Switzerland. He got a call from his contact at Alpine Airw
Evgen [1.6K]

Answer:

Justin's company should prepare to demonstrate that it is ISO 14001 compliant.

This means that it is following the environmental management standards for environmental footprint and waste reduction, while promoting environmental sustainability in its operations.

Explanation:

ISO 14001 is one of the environmental management standards, prescribed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), "to help reduce environmental impacts, reduce waste, and make the environment more sustainable," according to the ISO website.  ISO 14001 specifies requirements for an effective environmental management system (EMS) by providing a follow-able framework.

3 0
3 years ago
In Poland's free-market, Felix Siemienas is making a fortune in cold cuts. Prices are much higher than formerly. Siemienas says,
rjkz [21]

The correct answer would be, The Law of Demand.

Prices are much higher than formerly. Siemienas says, 'Yes my prices are high, if nobody buys, i bring my prices down. This is the market rule'. This rule best describes The Law of Demand.

Explanation:

In the field of economics, there are two basic concepts of Demand and Supply.

According to The Law of Demand, When the price of the good or service increases, the demand for that product or service decreases, and if price of the good or service decreases, the demand for that product or service increases, keeping all other factors constant.

So this is what Siemienas says that if the demand for his product will decrease, he will decrease the price of the product in order to maintain the sales of his company.

Learn more about The Law of Demand at:

brainly.com/question/1222851

#LearnWithBrainly

3 0
3 years ago
Copper Corporation, a calendar year C corporation, owns stock in Bronze Corporation and has net operating income of $900,000 for
Olegator [25]

Answer:

$150,000

Explanation:

Copper Corporation

The amount of dividends received deduction will tend to depends upon the ownership percentage by the corporate shareholder.

Therefore in a situation where Copper Corporation is said to owns only 85% of what Bronze Corporation had, Copper Corporation definitely qualify for a percentage of 100 deduction or a total amount of $150,000.if we have to based on the above information given because Bronze Corporation pays Copper Corporation a dividend of $150,000.

6 0
3 years ago
Bob Clarke Corporation has provided the following data from its activity-based costing system: Activities Estimated Overhead Cos
AfilCa [17]

Answer:

Total Unit Cost=  $ 96.65

Explanation:

Bob Clarke Corporation

Activities           Estimated Overhead Cost       Expected Activity

Assembly                     $1,005,040                 68,000 machine-hours

Processing orders       $102,500                       2,000 orders

Inspection                    $139,840                    1,900 inspection-hours

<u><em>First we find the overhead rates using ABC costing method.</em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

Overhead Rates=  Estimated Overhead Cost/ Expected Activity

Assembly Rate=   $1,005,040 /68,000 = $ 14.78 per machine-hours

Processing rate= $102,500 / 2,000= $ 51.25 per orders

Inspection Rate=  $139,840/ 1,900=  $ 73.6 per inspection-hours

<u><em>Then we find the overhead costs applying the ABC Costing rates</em></u>

<u><em></em></u>

Overhead Costs Of 450 Hockey

Assembly= 710 machine-hours, * $ 14.78= $10493.8

Processing=42 orders, *$ 51.25= $ 2152.5

Inspection= 12 inspection-hours*$ 73.6 = $ 883.2

Total Overhead Costs of 450 Hockey = $ 13529.5

Overhead Cost of One Hockey= 13529.5/450= 30.065=  $ 30.07

Then the:

Product Cost

Direct materials cost is $36.42 per hockey stick

Direct labor cost is $30.16 per hockey stick

Overhead Costs is $ 30.07

Total Unit Cost=  $ 96.65

7 0
3 years ago
Simon Company’s year-end balance sheets follow.At December 31 2017 2016 2015Assets Cash $ 36,335 $ 42,472 $ 42,524 Accounts rece
mina [271]

Answer:

(1) Debt Ratio in 2017 = 44.57%; Debt Ratio in 2016 = 39.33%; Equity Ratio in 2017 = 55.43%; and Equity Ratio in 2016 = 60.67%.

(2) Debt-To-Equity Ratio in 2017 = 80.42%; and Debt-To-Equity Ratio in 2016 = 64.83%.

(3) Times Interest Earned in 2017 = 4.71 times; and Times Interest Earned in 2016 = 4.22 times.

Explanation:

(1) Calculation of debt and equity ratios

Debt ratio is a ratio that is used to measure the ability of a company to pay off its liabilities with its assets. Debt ratio can be calculated using the following formula:

Debt Ratio = Total Debt / Total Assets

We can then calculate as follows:

Total debt = Accounts payable + Long-term notes payable secured by mortgages on plant assets

Total debt in 2017 = $159,605 + $120,505 = $280,110

Total debt in 2016 = $89,723 + $123,354 = $213,077

Total assets in 2017 = $628,417

Total assets in 2016 = $541,739

Debt Ratio in 2017 = $280,110 / $628,417 = 0.4457, or 44.57%

Debt Ratio in 2016 = $213,077 / $541,739 = 0.3933, or 39.33%

Equity ratio is a ratio that is used to measure the amount of assets of a company that are financed by the investments of the owners of the company. Equity ratio can be calculated using the following formula:

Equity Ratio = Total Equity / Total Assets

We can then calculate as follows:

Total equity = Common stock, $10 par value + Retained earnings

Total equity in 2017 = $162,500 + $185,807 = $348,307

Total equity in 2016 = $162,500 + $166,162 = $328,662

Equity Ratio in 2017 = 0.5543, or 55.43%

Equity Ratio in 2016 = 0.6067, or 60.67%

(2) Calculation of debt-to-equity ratio.

The debt-equity ratio provides the proportion of financing of a company that is contributed by creditors and investors. Debt-equity ratio can be calculated using the following formula:

Debt-To-Equity Ratio = Total Debt / Total Equity

Using the data in part (1) above, we can then calculate as follows:

Debt-To-Equity Ratio in 2017 = $280,110 / $348,307 = 0.8042, or 80.42%

Debt-To-Equity Ratio in 2016 = $213,077 / $328,662 = 0.6483, or 64.83%

(3) Calculation of times interest earned

The times interest earned ratio is a ratio that is used to determine the proportionate amount of income that that is required to cover interest expenses. The times interest earned ratio can be calculated using the following formula:

Times Interest Earned = Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) / Interest expenses

We can then calculate as follows:

EBIT = Sales - Cost of goods sold - Other operating expenses

EBIT in 2017 = $816,942 - $498,335 - $253,252 = $65,355

EBIT in 2016 = $644,669 - $419,035 - $163,101 = $62,533

Interest expenses in 2017 = $13,888

Interest expenses in 2016 = $14,827

Times Interest Earned in 2017 = $65,355 / $13,888 = 4.71 times

Times Interest Earned in 2016 = $62,533 / $14,827 = 4.22 times

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • __________ is the only variable which will decrease the amount brought to the market (quantity supplied) if all other variables
    5·1 answer
  • Whats the importance of an organized workstation
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following is an example of how the Principle of Beneficence can be applied to a study employing human subjects?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be relevant in the decision to sell or throw out obsolete inventory?
    8·1 answer
  • 1. Why is it important for a restaurant to identify a specific target market?
    13·1 answer
  • Benjamin, a military officer, strongly believes that a soldier has to do whatever it takes to protect his or her country. In the
    12·1 answer
  • What is the primary purpose of insurance? A) To pay for your mistakes B) To take money away from you C) To protect you against a
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following would be the least reliable source of scientific information?
    14·1 answer
  • Accounts payable, notes payable, and bonds payable are all common ______. multiple choice question. categories of assets liabili
    7·1 answer
  • facilities, factories, and production lines with very large equipment are all classified as a. installations. b. component parts
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!