2 years ago

Sunk costs:

Business

1 answer:

Vika [28.1K]2 years ago

8 0

Answer:

The correct answer to the following question is option C) this cost is ignored when evaluating alternatives .

Explanation:

Sunk cost which is also know as retrospective cost, where it can be described as a cost that business has already incurred and this cost cannot be recovered . These cost are usually ignored when decisions regarding future business are being taken , the reason behind this that the business will have to incurred this cost and it will remain the same no matter what decision is being taken .

You might be interested in

Funds acquired by the firm through retaining earnings have no cost because there are no dividend or interest payments associated

kow [346]

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Retained earnings have no flotation costs, but have opportunity costs. For example, if companies distribute the earnings to shareholders, shareholders can invest the funds in alternative sources for returns.

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Cual es la altura del edificio sis e conocen los datos que se muestran en la figura<br>

erastova [34]

Answer:

Falta que pongas la foto

4 0

3 years ago

What is the common term for the endline in soccer?

Mama L [17]

It is the goal line that is the common term for endline

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which of the following is a business plan most similar to? A pinball machine

pickupchik [31]

Answer:

C: A road map.

Explanation:

Business plans are mapped out just like road map. Pinball machines and dreams are not mapped out and wish lists are just collections of things that you want while a business plan is a plan of action.

Hope this helps! :)

5 0

3 years ago

What is the yield to maturity of a bond that as a face value of $1,000, is currently selling for $980, has a 5% coupon (paid sem

Ghella [55]

Answer:

5.47%

Explanation:

The computation of yield to maturity is shown in the attachment:

Given that

FV = $1000

PV = ($980)

PMT = 5% ÷ 2 × 1,000 = $25

Number of years = 5 years × 2 = 10 Years

The formula is shown below:

= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)

The present value come in negative

So, after applying the above formula, the yield to maturity is

= 2.73 × 2

= 5.46%

Therefore with the help of spreadsheets (as attached), we could explain in a better manner.

7 0

3 years ago