Answer:
If prithviraj had killed ghori in the first battle, there would be no need for a second battle where prithviraj would be defeated.
Explanation:
Although Prithviraj emerged victorious in the first battle, he proved to be an extremely arrogant and superb character, allowing Ghori to stay alive, even though he knew it could have dire consequences. This decision by Prithviraj was senseless and caused the need for a second battle where he was defeated, also because of his arrogance, allowing Ghori to continue his plans.
Answer:
Positive-practise Overcorrection.
Explanation:
This is a form of overcorrection in which, contingent on an occurrence of the target behavior, the learner is required to repeat a correct form of the behavior, or a behavior incompatible with the problem behavior, a specified number of times; entails an educative component. Examples could be removing gum from their mouth, wrapping it in paper, and placing it into the trash container.
Answer:
Explanation:
What did President William Howard Taft mean when he wrote that "the President can exercise no power which cannot be fairly reasonably traced to some specific grant of power or justly implied and included within such express grant as proper and necessary to its exercise"? How does this compare with President Theodore Roosevelt’s argument? Compare their arguments.Which position comes closest to the experience of the modern presidency? (Please note that this is about the institution of the presidency in modern experience, not about an individual president). Which position do you prefer?
The president can express no power which cannot be fairly and reasonably traced to some specific grant of power or justifiably implied and included within such express grant as proper and necessary to its exercise. Such specific grant must be either in the federal constitution or in an act of congress passed in pursuance thereof
