<span>An argument against euthanasia asserting that mercy killing would involve treating persons as mere things and of no more value than of a beast draws on "</span>Kant’s categorical imperative".
The Categorical Imperative should give an approach to us to assess moral activities and to make moral judgments. It's anything but a charge to perform particular activities - it doesn't state, "take after the 10 instructions", or "regard your senior citizens". It is basically "exhaust" - it is just formal technique by which to assess any activity about which may be ethically important.
Answer:
In the distribution of scarce resources, caste systems rely on ascribed statuses and class systems rely on achieved statuses. (letter D)
Explanation:
Class systems present a social hierarchy that results from a person's achievements, that is, through their effort. For instance, you can be born poor but end up wealthy by gaining knowledge that will lead you to better job opportunities. Therefore, this type of system has social mobility. It also allows for interactions between classes.
On the other hand, a caste systems is more rigid. Its statuses depend on what you already possess at birth, on what is ascribed to you. That is, your gender, race, wealth, etc. are all determined by your family, by what you are born with. This type of system does not allow for much mobility.
Answer:
Please add the options :) :)
Answer:
Everything!
Explanation:
I said everything because in the future there will be people looking around to understand what happened in the past.
Answer: They right of speech, to not ruled by someone else, religous freedom.
Explanation:
