Answer:
$230,000
Explanation:
Calculation for what the company's absorption-costing income would be:
First step is to calculate the Fixed manufacturing per unit
Fixed manufacturing per unit = $240,000 ÷ 40,000
Fixed manufacturing per unit= $6
Second step is to calculate the per units cost using this formula
Per Unit cost = Sales − Variable costs − Fixed OH
Let plug in the formula
Per Unit cost = $42 − $19 − $7 − $6 = $10 × 37,000
Per Unit cost = $370,000
Now let calculate the what the company's absorption-costing income would be
Absorption-costing=$370,000 − $140,000
Absorption-costing= $230,000
Therefore the company's absorption-costing income would be:$230,000
Answer:
d. 5,175 units.
Explanation:
The computation of the budgeted production units for July is shown below:
= Sale units + ending inventory units - beginning inventory units
where,
Sale units is 5,000 units
Ending finished inventory units = 5,700 units × 25% = 1,425 units
Beginning finished inventory units = 1,250 units
Now put these units to the above formula
So, the units would equal to
= 5,000 units + 1,425 units - 1,250 units
= 5,175 units
The amount that ACME Partnership should report as ordinary income is $83,000.
Data and Calculations:
Sales Revenue = $200,000
Cost of goods sold = 115,000
Gross profit = $85,000
Administrative expenses 2,000
Operating income = $83,000
Interest expense 13,000
Taxable income $70,000
Charitable contributions 2,000
Long-term capital gain 10,000
The operating income is the ordinary income before determining the eligibility of the charitable deductions and the long-term capital gain.
Thus, the ordinary income of ACME Partnership is $83,000.
Learn more: brainly.com/question/25056982
Answer:
Rainbow Paints Inc., Pakistan Vs XingPe Chemicals, China
1. Win-Lose Approach: Rainbow Paints Inc. was under an immense pressure to deliver on "production targets for the 2020." However, it approached the negotiation aggressively and assertively, blaming the Chinese company for its failure to deliver the required chemicals for its production. It did not care about the Coronavirus pandemic that is ravaging the world. It should not be confrontational in its approach. Business relationships are not maintained in such atmospheres. It must think long-term and not short-term. It should have tried to reduce its losses by minimizing its costs, using all possible means. Rainbow Paints, in its blindness, is even seeking for not only a compensation but the return of their payments, to ensure that the Chinese company bears the losses wholly. Such a negotiating strategy lacks common sense, fairness, and friendly business relationships.
2. Win-Win Approach: XingPe Chemicals approached the negotiation, seeking understanding. It cannot be blamed for the pandemic, unless it should have supplied before the outbreak. Its approach contrasts with the confrontational, aggressive, and assertive method being followed by the Pakistani company. Its approach is integrative and accommodating. It is even willing to share the losses of Rainbow Paints while Rainbow Paints was trying to push all of the losses to it.
Explanation:
There are many approaches to negotiation. Some prefer the Win-Lose, Lose-Lose, Compromise, or Win-Win approaches. The best for long-standing business relationships is the Win-Win approach, because it integrates and accommodates the interests of both parties. However, different situations call for the approach or combination of approaches to adopt.
