1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gemiola [76]
3 years ago
6

The Federalist Papers were written to encourage

History
2 answers:
katrin [286]3 years ago
8 0

delegates in Philadelphia to write a new constitution

enyata [817]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: B) the ratification of the Constitution.

Explanation: The Federalist Papers were written to encourage the ratification of the Constitution. They stated the opinions of the people that eventually comprised the Federalist Party

You might be interested in
On what issues did Stalin, Roosevelt, and Churchill disagree during WWII?
Whitepunk [10]

When and how to defeat Germany. Stalin and Roosevelt agreed that the us and Britain should attack Germany in the west and force them to divide their troops, but Churchill thought they needed more equipment,better trained soldiers and more landing craft then they should attack east west and south which FDR agreed with.

8 0
3 years ago
how are Buddhism and Hinduism similar and how are they different? Place each term in the correct space.
TiliK225 [7]

Answer:

Similarities: Reincarnation, Karma            

Differences: Belief in a creator god, Caste system, Four noble truths

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Given that our country is made up of immigrants, why do you suppose the country is having problems with allowing more immigrants
romanna [79]

Answer:

Because of terrorist attacks, new laws and policies, and better safety.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
4. The 22 Amendment limits a President to
astraxan [27]
It limited a President to two terms.
8 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement best defines a relevant question? A relevant question relates to the topic. A relevant question is possible to s
    12·2 answers
  • A fixed amount is called a ______.<br><br> question<br> quotient<br> quote<br> quota
    8·1 answer
  • Why did Parliament repeal the Stamp Act?
    7·1 answer
  • How has water affected Western Africa in economy
    9·1 answer
  • Instructions: The following is a passage that Harriet Beecher Stowe wrote in her book Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Please read the followi
    15·1 answer
  • When were these advertisements published?
    8·1 answer
  • Ahcjqvvlbefvlcjqs\n ckhbasd cebcwvc
    8·1 answer
  • All bills to be considered by the Oklahoma legislature must first go through the governor.
    8·1 answer
  • ہے
    11·1 answer
  • 3.1.3 Journal: Write Your Own Big-Picture Narrative <br> World History Sem 2<br> Points Possible:10
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!