Answer: This recommendation does not guarantee that this will happen because there are people who can develop personality disorders long before thinking about getting married.
Explanation:
People are different and react differently to life events due to several factors. Genetics and environmental factors exert a great influence when a person develops a mental disorder. Genetics influences that people who have a history with a history of personality disorders are more likely to develop the disease. It may be that before marriage he does not have it and then in marriage the person develops this disorder or another. Environmental factors may be due to situations that occur that trigger a response that leads the person to develop symptoms of a disorder.
While it is true that the study found that married people are less likely to develop personality disorders, it is not advisable to do so for these reasons, because the reasons why people decide to marry are different.
If a person decides to marry someone to avoid developing a personality disorder but then when getting married, he sees that things do not work and faces situations for which he was not prepared, this can lead to the person developing anxiety disorders or anxiety. depression, it all depends on the problems that occur.
The reasons for reaching marriage should be clear and people who decide to make this decision should do so not only thinking about their interests. It is important that a person not only takes this recommendation to get married and look at things from another perspective.
Marriage is an important step in the lives of many people. The person who decides to marry must understand the changes that it is going to experience and that certain behaviors that it adopted in its single life cannot be frequent in the married life since the responsibilities are different.
Answer:
Uniformitarianism is the idea that the same geologic processes shaping the Earth today have been at work throughout Earth's history.
Explanation:
Basically it's the idea that Earth has been going through the same process for forever. It shows how things like erosion have been going on throughout Earth's history.
<h3>
Answer:</h3><h3>Susanna. People tend to end up with those who match them in attractiveness</h3><h3>
Explanation:</h3>
The reason why "Susanna" would be the correct answer because Joe would mostly likely end up with Susanna because she meets the level of attraction that he has.
In life, people most of the time would end up dating/going out with someone that matches their attraction.
For example, a very attractive man would often end up with a very attractive woman. This is because the people would want someone else that they want as their partner meet the "visual" standards that they have.
If someone very attractive ends up with someone less attractive, then there could be a chance that the very attractive person starts losing attraction to the less attractive person, but that's not always the case.
<h3>I hope this helped you out.</h3><h3>Good luck on your academics.</h3><h3>Have a fantastic day!</h3>
Not sure but black are bad so i would say b or d
Answer:
The correct answer is a. Humphreys used license plate numbers to target their homes and interview the men without disclosing the real subject of his study.
Explanation:
Laud Humphreys (1930-1988) was a sociologist who for his PhD dissertation wrote a study called <em>Tearoom Trade</em> (1968), where he studied the behavior of males who engaged in homosexual sex in public toilets. Humphreys made a series of discoveries, like finding out that most of the men who engaged in these practices were not openly or overtly homosexual, and even a majority of them (54%) were married. However, his research was widely criticized because of how he performed it. Humphreys acted out as a sort of look-out for the men in the toilets, but without disclosing his identity as a researcher. Moreover, <u>Humphreys followed the unwitting subjects of his study to their homes by </u><u>tracking their license plate numbers and interviewed them</u><u>, posing as a government health officer and hiding his true identity as a sociologist conducting research</u>. Lying to subjects and hiding from them that they're part of a study is frowned upon by the scientific community, so the research was widely controversial, and it's still brought up as an example of the ethics of social research.
