Answer:had to exercise discretion in D.All of these are correct
Explanation:
What is meant by exercising discretion?
Exercising discretion means one doesn't make a haste decision but they first consider other factors before they act. Those factors need to be evaluated in terms of which matters the most.
A.He had to consider whether to shoot the suspect
- officers are not supposed to just shoot the suspect in haste without a reason to believe that the suspect poses a threat to them like when they pull a gun and shoot back.
B.He had to consider whether the shots fired were coming from the suspect
- If the suspect isn't the one shooting back it would not be called for to shoot he suspect but the person who is shooting.
C.He had to consider his safety and the safety for others
- firing shots may put people around in danger or in the line of fire where innocent people could die.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
I think after doing some quick googling I feel like D is the correct choice.
The Dred Scott case was a major event on the road to the Civil War. The Supreme Court's ruling was a provocative opinion. It stated flatly that Blacks had "no rights which the white man was bound to respect" and rejected the right of any territory to ban slavery within its own borders.
The answer is D b/c they basically denied him his rights and told him that someone's property cannot sue and said that just because he lived in a free state doesnt make him free.
Answer:
Explanation:
La investigación experimental es cualquier investigación realizada con un enfoque científico, donde un conjunto de variables se mantienen constantes, mientras que el otro conjunto de variables se miden como sujeto del experimento.
La investigación experimental es uno de los métodos de investigación cuantitativa principales.
El ejemplo más simple de una investigación experimental es una prueba de laboratorio. Siempre que la investigación se realice bajo condiciones científicamente aceptables, se califica como una investigación experimental.
Una verdadera investigación experimental se considera exitosa sólo cuando el investigador confirma que un cambio en la variable dependiente se debe a la manipulación de la variable independiente.
Es importante para una investigación experimental establecer la causa y el efecto de un fenómeno, lo que significa que debe ser claro que los efectos observados en un experimento se deben a la causa.
Como es natural, puede ser que los eventos que ocurran sean confusos y no permitan a los investigadores establecer conclusiones fácilmente.
Por ejemplo, un estudiante de cardiología realiza una investigación para comprender el efecto de los alimentos en el colesterol y resulta que la mayoría de los pacientes con problemas de corazón no son vegetarianos ni tienen diabetes, es porque comen carne (supongamos). Este último puede ser un aspecto (causa) que puede provocar un ataque cardiaco (efecto).
They must assume that the are not that good in the business industry
Well I can tell you Germany goes for air pollution,srry the other two idk.
