1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
adell [148]
3 years ago
9

Please Help!

Biology
1 answer:
Nat2105 [25]3 years ago
6 0
I would say riding a bike
You might be interested in
Which of these pollutants is a manufactured chemical used in fire extinguishers?
Ira Lisetskai [31]

Answer:

Handheld extinguishers, which are commonly sold at hardware stores for use in the kitchen or garage, are pressurized with nitrogen or carbon dioxide (CO2) to propel a stream of fire-squelching agent to the fire

3 0
2 years ago
gets BRAINILIST pls help need major help litarlly crying for help pls help me pls It question 11 of critical thinking 6th of 1.1
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]

Answer:

In this interview for Think magazine (April ’’92), Richard Paul provides a quick overview of critical thinking and the issues surrounding it: defining it, common mistakes in assessing it, its relation to communication skills, self-esteem, collaborative learning, motivation, curiosity, job skills for the future, national standards, and assessment strategies.

Question: Critical thinking is essential to effective learning and productive living. Would you share your definition of critical thinking?

Paul: First, since critical thinking can be defined in a number of different ways consistent with each other, we should not put a lot of weight on any one definition. Definitions are at best scaffolding for the mind. With this qualification in mind, here is a bit of scaffolding: critical thinking is thinking about your thinking while you’re thinking in order to make your thinking better. Two things are crucial:

1) critical thinking is not just thinking, but thinking which entails self-improvement

2) this improvement comes from skill in using standards by which one appropriately assesses thinking. To put it briefly, it is self-improvement (in thinking) through standards (that assess thinking).

To think well is to impose discipline and restraint on our thinking-by means of intellectual standards — in order to raise our thinking to a level of "perfection" or quality that is not natural or likely in undisciplined, spontaneous thought. The dimension of critical thinking least understood is that of  "intellectual standards." Most teachers were not taught how to assess thinking through standards; indeed, often the thinking of teachers themselves is very "undisciplined" and reflects a lack of internalized intellectual standards.

Question: Could you give me an example?

Paul: Certainly, one of the most important distinctions that teachers need to routinely make, and which takes disciplined thinking to make, is that between reasoning and subjective reaction.

If we are trying to foster quality thinking, we don't want students simply to assert things; we want them to try to reason things out on the basis of evidence and good reasons. Often, teachers are unclear about this basic difference. Many teachers are apt to take student writing or speech which is fluent and witty or glib and amusing as good thinking. They are often unclear about the constituents of good reasoning. Hence, even though a student may just be asserting things, not reasoning things out at all, if she is doing so with vivacity and flamboyance, teachers are apt to take this to be equivalent to good reasoning.

This was made clear in a recent California state-wide writing assessment in which teachers and testers applauded a student essay, which they said illustrated "exceptional achievement" in reasoned evaluation, an essay that contained no reasoning at all, that was nothing more than one subjective reaction after another. (See "Why Students-and Teachers-Don't Reason Well")

The assessing teachers and testers did not notice that the student failed to respond to the directions, did not support his judgment with reasons and evidence, did not consider possible criteria on which to base his judgment, did not analyze the subject in the light of the criteria, and did not select evidence that clearly supported his judgment. Instead the student:

Explanation: I have had this one before.

5 0
3 years ago
Would an ecosystem be sustainable with the majority being made up of secondary consumers?
brilliants [131]

Answer:

Explanation:

I don't think so

8 0
2 years ago
* The uterus lining<br>the fertilised ovum.​
wlad13 [49]

Answer:

umm

Explanation:

what do you mean please

7 0
3 years ago
Which fat has single bonds between tha carbon atoms in the fatty acid
Murrr4er [49]
Idk if i'm right but saturated?
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • explain how scientists classify/organize small bodies in the solar system. PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIESTTO WHOEVER ANSWERS!
    9·2 answers
  • The caterpillar, which is the larval stage of a butterfly, is very different from its adult form. Which phenomenon is responsibl
    12·2 answers
  • What does dependent variable
    5·1 answer
  • 7. As plants like corn made their way
    9·1 answer
  • A scientist wishes to substitute an amino acid in an iron-transporting protein from that of a bulky, charged side group to that
    13·1 answer
  • All living things need carbon. how does carbon enter the living portion of an ecosystem?
    15·1 answer
  • Waht type of information is recorded ina trace fossil
    14·1 answer
  • 4) Aos poucos, as pessoas estão aderindo às lâmpadas de LED que são mais eficientes, pois
    7·1 answer
  • Question 7 of 10
    13·1 answer
  • Chemical energy is used to do work in cells because the bonds in molecules contain ____________ energy.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!