Answer:
January 1, 202x, bank loan obtained from Taylor Bank (9 months, 9% interest rate)
Dr Cash 117,933
Cr Notes payable 117,933
Explanation:
Since this is an interest bearing note that will be paid in less than a year, we should record it at face value. All current liabilities must be recorded at face value.
Answer:
12.5
Explanation:
Money multiplier gives the maximum amount money supply can increase to given the reserve ratio
Money multiplier = 1 / r = 1 / 0.08 = 12.5
Answer:
The correct answer is Inductive reasoning.
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning is a form of reasoning in which the truth of the premises supports the conclusion, but does not guarantee it. A classic example of inductive reasoning is:
- All the crows observed so far have been black
- Therefore, all crows are black
In principle, it could be that the next crow observed is not black. In contrast to deductive reasoning, inductive reasoning has the advantage of being expansive, that is, the conclusion contains more information than is contained in the premises. Given its expansive nature, inductive reasoning is very useful and frequent in science and in everyday life. However, given its fallible nature, its justification is problematic. When are we justified in making an inductive inference, and concluding, for example, that all crows are black from a limited sample of them? What distinguishes a good inductive argument from a bad one? These and other related problems give rise to the problem of induction, whose validity and importance has continued for centuries.
Answer:
First Big Bank can file a lawsuit.
Explanation:
Debbie took the loan when he has the job and agreed to refund the loan or borrowed money. Unfortunate circumstances lead to the loss of his job resulting in the stoppage of loan repayment. Since Debbie did not make any crime so it will not come under criminal law but the bank can file a lawsuit against Debbie and he will be liable to pay a fine and penalties.
Answer:
a) Y = 500
b) Wages: 2.5
Rental price: 2.5
c) labor Share of output: 0.370511713 = 37.05%
Explanation:
if K = 100 and L = 100
Y = 500
wages: marginal product of labor = value of an extra unit of labor
dY/dL (slope of the income function considering K constant while L variable)
With K = 100 and L = 100
Y' = 2.5
rental: marginal product of land = value of an extra unit of land
dY/dK (slope of the income function considering K variable while L constant)
L = 100 K = 100
Y' = 2.5
c) we use logarithmic properties:
50 was the land while 10 the labor
2.698970004 = 1.698970004 + 1
share of output to labor: 1/2.698970004 = 0.370511713
