Answer:
Loss on disposal $1,800
Explanation:
Cost of Asset 26,000
Useful life 5years
Sale proceeds 19,000
Depreciation for the year=$26,000/5=$5,200
Written Down value(WDV)=$26,000-$5,200=$20,800
Loss on Disposal= Sale proceeds- WDV=$19,000-$20,800=$1,800
It is assumed that depreciation is fully charged for the year on asset.
Answer:
Have priority in the purchase of any newly issued shares
Explanation:
Preemptive right is the right given to existing shareholders to maintain the proportion of their investment by buying a proportionate number of shares in any future sales of share.
The main essence of this is to ensure that their ownership interest is not diluted as more shares are issued and new investors come in.
In a preemptive share arrangement , consideration is given to existing shareholders ahead of any other person or entity .
Stakeholder impact analysis is a five step process that allows managers to better understand and address stakeholders' needs.
Stakeholder impact analysis is a five steps process. Stakeholder impact analysis allows the manager to address the stakeholders’ needs and understand them better.
Stakeholder impact analysis is five steps process that allows managers to understand the need of their stakeholders. A stakeholder is any entity either person or organization, who is directly or indirectly affects the organization or its project.
The five steps of stakeholder impact analysis are:
- Identify the stakeholder: At this step, managers identify who are their stakeholders that are directly or indirectly affected by their projects, products, or services.
- The interest of the stakeholder: This step defines the interest of the stakeholder
- Opportunities and threats associated with stakeholders: this defines the present opportunities and threats to stakeholders
- Our responsibilities to stakeholders: This process defines that what is our legal, ethical, economic, and philanthropic responsibilities to our stakeholders
- Effectively address the stakeholders’ concerns: This step forces to take action to effectively address the stakeholders’ concerns.
You can learn more about stakeholder at brainly.com/question/15532995
#SPJ4
Answer:
To enforce this promise we need to analyse whether there has been any agreement or contract between Sarah and Odessa and whether the same can be enforced.
Explanation:
In Sarah's case, her offer to gratuitously pay the neighbor for assisting in the house fire is not an enforceable contract. When the neighbor rushed to help in the fire, the offer to pay $1,000 had not yet been extended. When Sarah did extend the offer to pay $1,000, there was no consideration exchanged between both parties. The consideration, putting out the fire, had already occurred without the offer or acceptance of a contract.
Consider an alternate scenario. Sarah's house was on fire, and she could not wait for the fire department. She ran to her neighbor's house, begged for help, and offered $1,000 in exchange for neighbor's assistance. After hearing Sarah's plea, the neighbor agrees to assist in extinguishing the fire. This constitutes a contract; an offer, consideration, and acceptance.
