Your answer would be B, since you can't make new energy from reactants, but when doing a chemical reaction, it uses energy that was already there to make something new
I believe the answer is c) 9:3:3:1 ratio (9 polka-dot tails and short eyelashes, 3 polka-dot tails and long eyelashes, 3 solid tails and short eyelashes 1 solid tail and long eyelash)
They would definitely agree with this analogy because they are both trying to emphasize the complexity and ingenuity of the DNA.
However, <span>Joseph Levine and David Suzuki see the DNA as much more than a program as they highlight the marvelous and the poetic nature of the DNA referring to both small-scale and personal aspect of its effect on individuals and also the large-scale effect on the evolution on all life on Earth.</span>
Any answer choices to your question?
Answer:
as far as you can go yes you would go though procedure
Explanation:
