Answer:
Annual deposit= $60,982.31
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Future Value= $2,500,000
Number of periods= 20 years
Interest rate= 0.07
<u>To calculate the annual deposit, we need to use the following formula:</u>
FV= {A*[(1+i)^n-1]}/i
A= annual deposit
Isolating A:
A= (FV*i)/{[(1+i)^n]-1}
A= (2,500,000*0.07) / [(1.07^20) - 1]
A= 60,982.31
Answer:
$75
Explanation:
$5 to $6.5 is a 1.3% increase and if the investor bought 50 shares of $5 he bought a total of $250 worth of stock. If you multiply the $250 by 1.3% it will be $325. But the question asks for the capital gain so you would subtract $325 and $250 which is $75.
Answer:
These two are cash equivalents:
Money market funds
Three-month Treasury bills
Because they represent short-term investments that a company makes with the goal of getting rid of any excess cash that would otherwise be left unused while it is losing value because of inflation.
In other words, the main goal of investments in money market funds and three-month treasury bills, is to prevent cash from losing value due to inflation, and because of that, those investments are considered cash equivalents.
Answer:
How many units are in process at May 31?
physical units ending WIP: 740
equivalent units WIP materials: 740
equivalent units WIP conversion: 296
Explanation:
We will add the beginning and started units, then subtract the trasnaferrd out to get the ending WIP inventory.
physical units:
beginning 490
started 1,650
transferred-out<u> (1,400) </u>
ending 740
Now we will multiply by the percentage of completion to get the equivlent units of WIP on each category:
<u>equivalent units for ending WIP:</u>
materials 740 x 100% = 740
conversion 740 x 40% = 296
Answer: Please refer to Explanation.
Explanation:
Two Companies. We shall call them A and B.
If A and B decide not to advertise, they both get $5,000,000.
If A advertises and B does not then A captures $3 million from B at a cost of $2 million meaning their payoff would be,
= 5 million - 2 million + 3 million
= $6 million.
A will have $6 million and B will have $2 million as $3 million was captured from them. This scenario holds true if B is the one that advertises and A does not.
If both of them Advertise, they both reduce their gains by $2 million while capturing $3 million from each other so they'll essentially both have just $3 million if they both decide to advertise.
With the above scenarios, it is better for both companies to ADVERTISE if there is NO COLLUSION. This is because it ensures that they do not get the lowest payoff of $2 million if the other company decides to advertise and they do not.
However, if they DO COLLUDE. They must both decide that NONE of them SHOULD ADVERTISE and this would leave them with their original $5 million each which is a higher payoff than the $3 million they will both receive if they were both advertising.