Answer:
This is not an example of a high-quality PLAAFP statement.
Explanation:
PLAAFP statement is the term that refers to a student's academic performance levels and functional performance levels, that is, the PLAAFP shows the student's quality levels in relation to their ability to respond positively to academic concepts, such as reading correctly, understand complex subjects, but suitable for their academic level, write correctly and be able to do operations and school activities. The PLAAFP statement is very useful as it serves as a basis for presenting teachers and education professionals how a particular student should be monitored to strengthen their academic weaknesses.
The case shown in the question above presents a student with great difficulty in reading and understanding what he is reading. In this case, this student has a low quality of PLAAFP statement and this serves to encourage teachers to read and make this student overcome this difficulty.
Tariff makes the most sense. Embargo is a ban on goods or a country, subsidy is money granted from the government to a business and has nothing to do with trade, quota is a limited amount of a product and again doesn't really have anything to do with trade.
all i found aquandi and all around it
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Appearance is not a reliable predictor of character :) What’s on the outside does not always match what’s on the inside
The answer to this quesiton is <span>based on inferiority of women.
Harriet Martineau lived during the 1800s and she argued that women on her time were treated as mere objects by both their family and society.
The marriage often used to solidify their father's position on certain business deals to increase their wealth.</span>