Answer:
to be honest i dont know im sorry but i hope you find out
Explanation:
The agriculture influence the economic development of the South and the growth of slavery because slave owners realized that by having more slaves they could make more money.
For Lincoln, allowing American democracy to succeed was compatible with the ideal of freedom; allowing secessionists to destroy it (in response to a democratic election) was not. In other words, Lincoln did not believe that true freedom was letting states do their own thing--and letting the pillars of American constitutional democracy run amok--but instead, in maintaining a union where the great experiment of democracy could flourish. As Lincoln himself said quite clearly in the Gettysburg Address, he was committed to making sure "...that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth." I suppose you can argue that Lincoln's vision of freedom was not worth the price, but you cannot deny that he had a vision of freedom--and that, for him, this vision was compatible with maintaining the historic, unprecedented political freedom that was achieved in 1776.
Yes, it is true that with the support of Henry Clay, John Quincy Adams was elected as the next president, since Clay and Adams both belonged to the same political party.
