Why was egypt and nubia interdependent?

1 answer:

8 0

The reason Egypt and Nubia were interdependent, meaning that both countries had to rely on one another for certain resources that were needed, was because both countries needed each others help. Numbia had more trade routes than Egypt, had natural resources they were interested in, and could also help fight off any invaders of Egypt.

You might be interested in

What was unusual about the shantytown that was located in Seattle, Washington?

irina1246 [14]

Shantytowns were the shacks which were built by the destitute and homeless people in America.

Explanation:

These Shantytowns were named as Homerville’s because Herbert Hoover was the president who left the country get into the clutches of depression and he did not take necessary steps that paved way for development. It was the encampments that were built from the shacks and other waste materials by the impoverished and unemployed people during the time of great depression.

Bothe blacks and whites and other immigrants lived conjointly which integrated everyone beyond race and ethnicity.

4 0

3 years ago

Communism is an economic and political system in which the government owns or controls all factors of production, and there is a

d1i1m1o1n [39]

The workers were being exploited by the upper class who controlled wealth and the means of production.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

“If Agriculture Goes Wrong, Nothing Else Will Have A Chance To Go Right In The Country”- M S Swami Nathan. With Reference To The

Fiesta28 [93]

Explanation:

if he can go to goes wrong if you see what else you have a chance to go as income should I swung itnow the game evolution is you know as you know the green evolution is the the green Revolution is taking over this modern technology because now humans cannot do without as you all know humans cannot do without food so in order for secure evolution

4 0

4 years ago

A major difference between sound recordings made by Emile Berliner and those made by Thomas Edison was that ______.

DENIUS [597]

Full question:

A major difference between sound recordings made by Emile Berliner and those made by Thomas Edison was that ______.

A. Berliner's disks were flat

B. Edison's disks could be mass produced

C. Edison's disks were coated with lamp black

D. Berliner's disks were made of vinyl

E. None of the above.

Answer:

A major difference between sound recordings made by Emile Berliner and those made by Thomas Edison was that Berliner's disks were flat

Explanation:

Thomas Edison created recorded sound technology, but Emile Berliner's designs began to its mass spread. Berliner flat record disk ultimately supplanted the added flimsy and clumsy Edison cylinders as users' sound technology of preference.

The disk design made flat enhanced the pattern for extent manufactured business sound disks and was the forerunner of nowadays discs patterns. The designated sound-component of the Berliner Collection consists of various disc records generated by the Berliner Gramophone Company. Thomas Edison disk consisted of a thin coating of a phenolic resin

3 0

4 years ago

Analyze the map below and answer the question that follows.

dlinn [17]

A artic but not sure if I’m correct

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers