The statement that best explains Wright's assertion that he and his father "were forever strangers" is:
Wright is stating that he is emotionally disconnected from his father.
Whenever two persons are strangers to each other. They are ignorant of the other person's thoughts and emotions. When Wright says that he and his father were forever strangers. Wright is highlighting that he was unaware and ignorant to who his father was. Also, one can conclude that his father probably felt the same way.
Answer: ethical lapse
Explanation:
An ethical lapse is an error or mistake in judgement that an individual commits which brings about a harmful outcome. It is usually as a result of an oversight as it really doesn't mean that the individual lacks integrity.
The scenario in the question is an ethical lapse. This is because the extra $25 she pocketed wasn't accounted for as it was an oversight and it wasn't that she intentionally stole the $25 or didn't account for it intentionally.
Answer:
creditor
Explanation:
Blue Wholesale Shirt Co. and Pink Retail Shoppe are business partners. The products produced by the Blue Wholesale Shirt Co. is bought by Pink Retail Shoppe. And Pink Retail Shoppe pays Blue Wholesale Shirt Co. in terms of money for the products purchased.
It is mentioned that Pink Retail Shoppe purchased shirts from Blue Wholesale Shirt Co. and the owner of the Pink Retail Shoppe promises to pay Blue Wholesale Shirt Co. at a later date in the future.
This makes the Blue Wholesale Shirt Company the creditor because Pink Retail Shoppe owes money to Blue for the purchased of the product. A creditor in one whom money is to be owed.
Thus the answer is creditor.
I think it’s c yeah im not 100% sure
