Answer:
A :savant syndrome, C :burgers. d: a heuristic and finally B: MA-CA
Explanation:
Hi there!
The principle of SOCIAL CONFORMITY.
It showed that people tend to engage behaviours more likely in confirmation of the society at large.
The interesting question is when everybody is thinking about confirming then who decide what behavior to engage in, from the start? That is if we are supposed to DRINK in a Social gathering when all are drinking. Then who thought that Drinking is to be done by all, or who sets the social norm and how is the degree of strictness understood and enforced?
is it something we just think and that the norms doesn't actually exist?
Some food for thought!
hope it make sense!
Answer: naturalistic observation
Explanation: Naturalistic observation is a technique used in the study of subjects in their natural habitat without any manipulation or interference from the observer. The aim of naturalistic observation is to describe in detail the behaviour of an organism in their natural setting, situation or habitat.
Conducting a naturalistic observation offers some advantages which include:
I) allowing investigation of behaviours that occur in complex social settings.
II) allowing the researcher to gather qualitative as well as quantitative data and
III) allowing the development of theories based on collected observations etc.
However, it is less useful in studying well-defined hypotheses under precisely specified conditions since they are typically designed not to confirm previously formed hypotheses.
Answer:
natural causes and assignable causes.
Explanation:
The answer is A. delegating authority. hope it helps :)
