1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
4 years ago
15

How did the persian empire attempt to impose political unity on its people?in other words, what were the political characteristi

cs of the persian empire?
History
1 answer:
AVprozaik [17]4 years ago
3 0
<span>The Persian Empire imposed political unity on its people through its extensive and complex political structures of antiquity. Their complex policies were based on a simple and simple basis. The Persian monarchy was hereditary in which chaos and disturbances were produced constantly, producing numerous confrontations. The political authority of this empire was seen as a divine authority, its hierarchies consisted of a king, followed by the court and a royal court. He had an inefficient army. Persian policies were organized by King Darius, who divided the territory into smaller provinces.</span>
You might be interested in
19. At times, theatergoers were a nuisance. What did they do?
Katarina [22]

In the late 19th century the habits of the theatergoers was not the best. In fact,  they were mostly a rural audience, and sometimes they were rowdy. The managers of the theaters tried to make everyone behave in a civil manner. One of the main complains was the tobacco spit all over the floor around the entertainment venues. At some point those people were required to carry a spittoon to avoid spitting in the floor.

Theatergoers were not required to sit still and be quiet like they do now. They actually ate and drank during the presentation, and sometimes interrupted the performance.  Theater owners were very concerned with these disturbances and tried to enforce good behavior.

Even though there was some occasional annoying behavior by theatergoers, for the most  part they were very polite, responsive and receptive to the performance.    

5 0
4 years ago
Would the South have been more successful with Reconstruction or without Reconstruction?
OverLord2011 [107]

Answer:

Without Reconstruction

Explanation:

They have poor background.

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Think about Miranda v. Arizona and how it related
Ludmilka [50]

The correct answers are The Fifth and Sixth Amendment

Explanation:

Miranda v. Arizona was a legal case in 1966, in this, Ernesto Miranda accused of kidnapping and sexual abuse confessed during the interrogation, which led to a sentence of about 20 years. However, Miranda was never told he could have counsel or guidance of a lawyer, he could remain in silence, or his words would be used against him, which means he was not informed of his rights and the legal procedure was not followed. Due to this, the Supreme Court determined the trial and process had not been legal and a retrial was necessary.

Moreover, this decision was related to the fifth amendment that protects against self-incrimination including the right to not answer questions against oneself; as well as, the sixth amendment that establishes a public, speedy and fair trial should be guaranteed. Thus, this case addressed the fifth and sixth amendments.

6 0
3 years ago
Real life examples of political revolution
Ede4ka [16]
The revolutions<span> in France at 1830 and 1848 are examples of </span>political revolutions. 

<span>During this time in France the revolutionary events ended the Orleans monarchy</span><span> and led to the creation of the </span>French<span> Second Republic. Following the overthrow of the king. T</span><span>he elected government of the Second Republic ruled </span>France<span>.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
what was the tidelands controversy, and how did it represent a major change i n texas politics in the 1950s?
In-s [12.5K]
Basically, Texas has had underwater areas for as long as it has existed. When it was discovered that there were oil deposits there, the federal government wanted to take it away from Texas who was a recognize owner of the land. It was a case where the state and the federation had to fight in the supreme court. Politics changed because Texas started hating on anyone who tried to take it away so they switched their presidential support based on this.
5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement bestexplains how the Constitution addressed a weakness in the Articles of Confederation?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of these would have been a goal of the Ku Klux Klan in the south during Reconstruction?
    13·2 answers
  • on the western front during world war 2 british and US forces began their push toward berlin with the invasion of
    14·1 answer
  • Why didn’t the Allied Powers, who knew the mass killings were taking place, focus their firepower on the ovens and the killing o
    14·1 answer
  • Where are the most culturally diverse areas in Latin America
    6·1 answer
  • Which greenhouse gas is the most abundant in our atmosphere ? * A. Oxygen B. Carbon Dioxide C. Nitrous D. Oxide Methane
    15·2 answers
  • Which statement best describes the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
    10·2 answers
  • How did economic concerns contribute to the creation of the Monroe Doctrine? ​
    12·1 answer
  • All of the following were goals of the Five-Year Plans EXCEPT....
    11·1 answer
  • Why does the narrator interrupt her story the leap
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!