Answer:
It had a very positive impact on Dr. King's reputation for;
1. It helped him have a legacy, something people could remember him for.
2. It influenced his winning the Man of The Year Award and the Nobel Peace Prize.
Explanation:
The Children's Crusade launched on May 1963 was an initiative of Rev. James Bevel an adviser to King who wanted children to begin their own march. Dr. Martin Luther King greatly encouraged the children to participate in this march. According to the author of this text, this march changed the face of the movement and helped many to embrace the end to segregation preached by the blacks.
Without this crusade, the author believes that Dr. King may not have been recognized for all of his hardwork in the black emancipation struggle.
Answer:
B.Gallaudet University should appoint a person who is deaf as its next president.
Explanation:
The author's thesis is best summarized in option B. The first evidence where the author claims that a deaf person should be the president of Gallaudet University is when he mentions that disabled people have the right to integration and involvement in society.
The second piece of evidence that supports the thesis is when the author says, "It [Gallaudet University] is held in the highest regard by deaf people throughout the United States and the world." Claiming that it should be an example for the nation and the world that the president of such a prestigious university has a disability. The last piece of evidence that supports his thesis is in the fifth paragraph "Gallaudet has a responsibility to set an example and thus to appoint a President who is not only highly qualified but who is also deaf."
The first and the third sentences contain parallel structures. Parallel structure, or parallelism, is the repetition of the same grammatical structure or form within a sentence, so it becomes more balanced, and, therefore, more readable and clear to understand.
In the first sentence, the parallel structure has been used in the comparison: "... would make war <em>rather than let</em> the nation survive and accept war<em> rather than let</em> it perish..."
In the third sentence the same grammatical form has been used too: "<em>all dreaded it </em>(1) <em>all sought to</em> avert <em>it </em>(2)."
There is a paradox in this text because the author recognizes violence should stop but at the same time considers retreat is negative (third option.)
<h3>What is a paradox?</h3>
A paradox refers to a contradiction, this occurs when opposite terms are together in a sentence, claim, or opinion.
<h3>What is the paradox in this text?</h3>
The author has a contradictory opinion about war. First, he states war must stop "we can and should limit the violence and the suffering being inflicted on the civilians as much as possible" and despite this, he then states a retreat is not a good idea since it can have negative effects "resulting political and psychological shockwaves."
Learn more about paradox in: brainly.com/question/3424059
#SPJ1
Answer:
B I think
“modify” is to change or to alter something.
SO I THINK IT B...:)
Explanation:
