You understand life so this has to be 20 characters so hello
COMPLETE PROBLEM
Lana, a ten-year-old child, is run over by a car negligently driven by Mitchell. Lana, at the time of the accident, was acting reasonably and without negligence. Clark, a newspaper reporter, photographs Lana while she is lying in the street in great pain. Two years later, Perry, the publisher of a newspaper, prints Clark's picture of Lana in his newspaper as a lead to an article concerning the negligence of children. The caption under the picture reads: "They ask to be killed." Lana, who has recovered from the accident, brings suit against Clark and Perry. What result? Explain.
Explanation:
Judgement for Lana against Perry but not against Clark. The facts make out a case against Perry for the tort of invasion of privacy in particular placing another in a false light (INVASION OF PRIVACY:FALSE LIGHT). Section 652E of the restatement imposes liability for publicity which places another in a false light. It is unlikely that Perry could utilize the first amendment as a defense because Lana was neither a public official nor a public figure. Even if that defense were available, it is forfeited if Perry acted with "malice", which appears to be the case here because Perry acted in reckless disregard of the truth. Clark did not commit the tort of intrusion because he photographed an event that occurred in public.
Answer:
Quality is the perhaps the most desired thing in a good or service, however, sometimes, as customers, we have to compromise on quality for a cheaper price.
Personally, I look for quality when I buy a laptop. I have had four laptos in my life. Two of those laptops were HP, and the two other were Lenovo.
I had a good experience with my first HP laptop, so I bought another one years later. That second HP had many technical issues only a few months after the purchase, and a year later I ended up buyina new Lenovo laptop.
That first Lenovo lasted for over 4 years until I replaced it for a new one.
In this case, the lack of quality I have personally experienced with HP has made me ditch the brand altogether.
Answer:
NPV =$ 60,311.80
Explanation:
<em>The net present value (NPV) of a project is the present value of cash inflow less the present value of cash outflow of the project.</em>
NPV = PV of cash inflow - PV of cash outflow
We can set out the cash flows of the project using the table below:
0 1 2 3
Operating cash flow 136,000 136,000 136,000
Initial cost (274,000)
Working capital (61,000 ) 61,000
Salvage value <u> </u> <u> </u> <u> </u> 1<u>5000 </u>
Net cashflow <u> (335,000) 136,000 136,000 212,000.</u>
PV inflow= (136000)× (1.1)^(-1) + (136,000× (1.1)^(-2) + (112,000)× (1.1)^(-3)
= 395,311.80
NPV =395,311.80 -335,000
=$ 60,311.80
Answer:
During the growth stage of the product life cycle, the growth of a product begins to plateau, and the company must take advantage of economies of scale and marketing messages and promotions that seek to remind customers about a great product, differentiate from competitors, and reinforce brand loyalty.
Explanation:
Hope this helped
