Answer:
A) $50
Explanation:
The computation of the intrinsic value of the stock is shown below:
But before that the required rate of return is computed by using CAPM
Required rate of return = Risk-free rate of return + Beta × (Market rate of return - risk-free rate of return)
= 5% + 0.5 × (13% - 5%)
= 5% + 0.5 × 8%
= 5% + 4%
= 9%
Now the intrisinc value is
= Dividend ÷ (required rate of return - growth rate)
= $6 ÷ (9% - (-3%)
= $6 ÷ 12%
= $50
Hence, the intrinsic value of the stock is $50
Therefore the correct option is A.
Answer:
The remaining part of the question:
Which statement is TRUE?
A. Because the payment received by the IAR is small, there is no requirement to notify the client of the payment arrangement with the executing broker
B. Because the client has an investment objective of aggressive growth, requiring an active trading strategy, there is no requirement to notify the client of the payment arrangement with the executing broker
C. The IAR must notify the client of the payment arrangement with the executing broker
D. The IAR must notify RIA of the payment arrangement with the executing broker
<u>Correct Answer:</u>
<u>C. The IAR must notify the client of the payment arrangement with the executing broker
.</u>
<u />
Explanation:
Answer:
WACC = 0.18 or 18%
Option b is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The WACC or weighted average cost of capital is the cost of a firm's capital structure that can contain one or more of the following components, namely debt, preferred stock and common equity. The formula to calculate the WACC is as follows,
WACC = wD * rD * (1-tax rate) + wP * rP + wE * rE
Where,
- w represents the weight of each component
- D, P and E represents debt, preferred stock and common equity respectively
- r represents the cost of each component
- rD * (1-tax rate) represents the after tax cost of debt
WACC = 0.2 * 0.16 + 0.8 * 0.185
WACC = 0.18 or 18%
Answer:
The right approach will be "$ 1123.2".
Explanation:
The number of miles to be used will be:
= 
= 
Now,
The item deduction will be:
= 
= 
=
($)
The decision to build the park or not would be based solely
on the cost – benefit relationship of this project. Since there is no other
factor considered in this problem, you only need to see if the benefit of
constructing the park would exceed its cost. In this problem, the cost to
construct the park is $20,000 while the marginal benefit would be $24,000
($8,000 x 3 families that can benefit from this project). Therefore, you can
say that the benefit has exceeded its cost. As a conclusion, the neighborhood
park should be built because it benefits the families living in that area more
than its cost.