Answer:
$5.73(Approx).
Explanation:
Given:
= 0.32
Growth rate = 25% = 0.25
Number of year = 4
Growth rate after 4 year = 3% = 0.03
Required rate of return = 15% = 0.15
Computation of divined in 4 year:
Price of stock after year 4 = [Divined in 4 year × (1 + new growth)] /[Required rate of return - Growth rate after 4 year ]
Price of stock after year 4 = [0.78125 × (1+0.03)] / [0.15 - 0.03]
Price of stock after year 4 = [0.8046875] / [0.12]
Price of stock after year 4 = $6.70572917
Present value = Future value / 
Present value = $6.70572917 / 
Present value = $6.70572917 / 
$5.73(Approx).
Answer:
The correct answer is $255,000.
Explanation:
According to the scenario, the given data are as follows:
Total outstanding shares = 510,000
Shares value before = $3.10
Shares value after deal = $3.60
So, we can calculate the amount of gain on disposal by using following formula:
Gain amount on disposal = Total number of shares × Difference in share value
By putting the value, we get
= 510,000 × ( $3.60 - $3.10)
= 510,000 × $0.50
= $255,000
Answer:
1)
cost of making (14000*22) = 308000
cost of buying (14000*(18+6)) = 336000
Difference cost = 28000
2)
No, Since, there is not other use of fixed cost, therefore, fixed cost will be a part of cost of buying.
3-a)
cost of making (14000*22) = 308000
cost of buying (14000*18) = 252000
3-b)
Yes, Since, there is other use of fixed cost, therefore, fixed cost will not be a part of cost of buying.
Answer:
See the explanation below.
Explanation:
The court likely to rule in favor of Ewing.
The reason is that the enough consideration that gives backing to a promise in this case is generally the waiver of a legal right to eat to obesity as requested by the other party.
The evidence that Ewing has lost 154 pounds in weight over the stipulated period is a consideration that sufficient enough under the law. The payment of $10 pound that Ewing has lost is a promise. The fact that Ewing also benefit from the weight loss does not matter.
Answer:
d. an increase in the quantity of bicycles demanded.
Explanation:
For this question, the law of demand applies.
According to the law of demand, when the price of the good increases the quantity demanded of that good would be decreased keeping other things constant and when the price of the good decreases the quantity demanded of that good would be increased keeping other things constant.
It reflects the inverse relationship between the price and the quantity demanded of the good.
