Hey there!
ANSWER: 
EXPLANATION:
To find the answer to your question, you will need to add.
First, multiply the denominator.
So the denominator will be 20.
Now move on to the numerator. Multiply 5 by 3.
Now multiply 4 bu 2.
If you want to get the numerator, add what you got after multiply.
The numerator is 23. So now let's complete the fraction.
This is your answer!
Hope this helps!
Answer:
b. type II
Step-by-step explanation:
given that food inspectors inspect samples of food products to see if they are safe. This can be thought of as a hypothesis test with the following hypotheses.
H0: the food is safe
Ha: the food is not safe
It was concluded from the hypothesis test that the food is safe while it was not actually safe.
This is a case of false acceptance of null hypothesis when it is false.
In hypothesis test, there are two errors. a type I error is the rejection of a true null hypothesis while a type II error is the non-rejection of a false null hypothesis
So this is type II error because we did not reject a false null hypothesis.
1532 ÷ 36 = 42 and remain 20.
So there were 20 CDS in the remains box
40 boxes would weigh would weigh 120 pounds
The first step for solving this expression is to insert what a and b stand for into the expression. This will change the expression to the following:
2(2)(4)³ + 6(2)³ - 4(2)(4)²
Now we can start solving this by factoring the expression
2(2 × 4³ + 3 × 2³ - 4 × 4²)
Write 4³ in exponential form with a base of 2.
2(2 ×
+ 3 × 2³ - 4 × 4²)
Calculate the product of -4 × 4².
2(2 ×
+ 3 × 2³ -4³)
Now write 4³ in exponential form with a base of 2.
2(2 ×
+ 3 × 2³ -
)
Collect the like terms with a base of 2.
2(
+ 3 × 2³)
Evaluate the power of 2³.
2(
+ 3 × 8)
Evaluate the power of
.
2(64 + 3 × 8)
Multiply the numbers.
2(64 + 24)
Add the numbers in the parenthesis.
2 × 88
Multiply the numbers together to find your final answer.
176
This means that the correct answer to your question is option A.
Let me know if you have any further questions.
:)
