1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
stiks02 [169]
3 years ago
15

An amicus curiae brief is __________. A.a prior judicial decision that serves as a rule for settling subsequent cases of a simil

ar nature B.a legal document filed by interested parties to a case prior to a hearing or trial in order to influence the court's decision C.a law passed by Congress that deals with the court system D.a bureaucratic regulation that deals with the court system
History
2 answers:
Shtirlitz [24]3 years ago
7 0
The proper answer is "B. A legal <span> document filed by interested parties to a case prior to a hearing or trial in order to influence the court's decision." The court does not have to hear this opinion, however. </span>
kotykmax [81]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The correct answer is B. An amicus curiae brief is a legal document filed by interested parties to a case prior to a hearing or trial in order to influence the court's decision.

Explanation:

The amicus curiae is a Latin expression used to refer to presentations made by third parties outside a litigation, who voluntarily offer their opinion in front of any point of law or other related aspect, to collaborate with the court in the resolution of the subject matter of the process.

The information provided may consist of a writing with a legal opinion, a testimony not requested by any party or a report in law on the subject of the case. The decision on the admissibility of an amicus curiae is generally left to the discretion of the respective court.

You might be interested in
Which of the following statements would likely have come from someone living on the west coast of medieval Europe?
pantera1 [17]
C.<span>We have to be prepared for raids from ferocious invaders from Scandinavia</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP! Will give brainliest. Considering the last 400 years of history, was the Columbian Exchange mostly positive or negative fo
grigory [225]
Though there were positive effects, the Columbian Exchange had a long-lasting negative impact. Considerably, the Colombian Exchange was an exchange of guns, germs, gold, and (religious) glory.
For generations, Christopher Columbus was considered a hero of American history. He and the European explorers that followed were credited with bringing civilization to a new land. Their discoveries provided a way for Europeans to leave the continent and make new lives for themselves. While the explorers were on a quest for gold and riches, they also sought to spread Christianity and European ideals. In their view, the peoples they encountered in the New World were uncivilized and ignorant. They brought European ideas and Western religion to the continent, leading to a mixing of cultures.
Christopher Columbus’s arrival in the Americas facilitated the exchange of plants, animals and new diseases.
Europeans did bring new technologies and animals such as horses, cattle, sheep, and goats. However, those improvements came at a high price. The conquistadors (Spanish invaders) destroyed religious temples, and they killed those who refused to convert. Guns traded to indigenous peoples also increased the death toll among tribes fighting amongst one another, especially in North America.
More than guns, the most devastating result of the Columbian Exchange was the spread of disease. In the years following European invasion, it is estimated that up to 95 percent of the Americas’ total population died. That’s approximately 19 million people. The native population was almost wiped out. The main cause of death was disease, such as smallpox. These diseases did not exist in the New World prior to the European’s arrival. Because the native peoples had no natural immunity, they became sick. Europeans were less affected by disease outbreaks because they had been exposed to the germs before when they worked with domesticated animals. There was also little understanding of disease and how to contain outbreaks. As a result, these diseases spread rapidly. Also, since there was very little understanding of disease, the Europeans thought the native peoples were weak and sickly. Huge numbers of the native populations were wiped out from diseases, which led to a big shortage of labor. In addition, native people knew the land and could often escape if they were forced to work. Europeans quickly realized that they could not build a workforce out of the native peoples. The Europeans needed manual labor for the agricultural enterprises they set up, so they turned to the African slave trade. Beginning in the 1500s, thousands upon thousands of enslaved Africans were shipped to the continent.
In fact, the majority of enslaved Africans ended up in the Caribbean, Central America, and South America (ultimately almost 12 million). Approximately 500,000 were shipped to North America. Current economic hardships and social injustices today can still be traced back to the period of European domination. For example, native populations all over the North American continent struggle with issues of poverty and lack of opportunities. While there are still some Incan, Mayan, Aztec, and Native American cultures that remain today, many continue to struggle some 500 years after Columbus.

I hope this helps! My father was a world history teacher, so I may have provided a little excess information, depending on what you have and have not covered in your studies of the Columbian Exchange. :)
5 0
3 years ago
Who was the first president to send us combat troops to fight in the Vietnam war
Keith_Richards [23]

Answer:

President Johnson

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
I need help pleaseeeeeeeee ??
Anon25 [30]
The answer is b I took the test already
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the English overcome their early economic and social challenges? <br> Colonial Era.
Alisiya [41]

The monarchy dominated society, trade and economic opportunities, and in consequence, political institutions became weaker and the economy declined. ... Colonialism did not, however, merely impact the development of those societies that did the colonising. Most obviously, it also affected the societies that were colonised.

Indian society underwent many changes after the British came to India. In the 19th century, certain social practices like female infanticide, child marriage, sati, polygamy and a rigid caste system became more prevalent.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why was the first book ever printed considered important by the population?
    13·2 answers
  • How were civilians affected by the siege of Vicksburg?
    8·2 answers
  • Because the British government had imposed taxes on colonists without representation, the drafters of the Articles of Confederat
    14·2 answers
  • In what ways did the war become a symbol of liberty?
    7·1 answer
  • What can you infer from Soviet actions in Hungary in 1956 ?
    13·1 answer
  • The main purpose of the route seen here was to
    10·2 answers
  • What did our ancestors use to mark their skin?
    13·1 answer
  • What was the last state to verify the federal constitution
    5·1 answer
  • Who called Abraham when he left haran
    11·1 answer
  • Type the correct answer in the box. Spell all words correctly.
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!