Jaime is incorrect, the angle does not depend on the radius of the circles.
<h3>Is Jaime correct?</h3>
Remember that an angle that defines an arc on a circle, does not depend on the radius of the circle.
So, if we have an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 3 inches and an angle with a measure of π/3 radians in a circle with a radius of 6 inches, these two angles are exactly the same thing.
The radius of the circle only has an impact on the length of the arc defined by the angle.
So Jaime is clearly incorrect.
If you want to learn more about angles:
brainly.com/question/17972372
#SPJ1
Answer:
Hello! A function is easily identified when an x value does not have more than 1 y value. a y value can have as many x values to infinity, but x can only have one y.
Example...
x y
3 5
4 5
1 2
The two labeled angles are alternate interior angles, and as such, they are the same.
From this result you can build the equation
and solve it for x: subtract 13x from both sides to get
and add 2 to both sides to get
Check: if we plug the value we found we have
So the angles are actually the same, as requested.
We first find out the amount in dollars of interest accrued after 2 years time.
Interest = Prt
where P is the principal, r is the rate and t is time
8% written in decimal fraction → 8/100 → 0.08
Interest = 17000 × 8% × 2
Interest = 1700 × 0.08 × 2
Interest = 2,720 dollars
We add the principal and the interest to get full amount paid, so:
17000 + 2,720 = 19,720
I hope that you good day
Answer:
4
Step-by-step explanation: