Young schoolteacher Charles Edward Chipping (Robert Donat) imposes strict discipline on his young charges at a Victorian-era English public school, becoming a fearsome presence on the campus grounds. But the love of spirited young suffragette Katherine Ellis (Greer Garson) brings the Latin instructor out of his shell and makes him a beloved campus institution into the 20th century and through the shattering violence of World War I. The film is based on the best-selling novel by James Hilton.
They reveal that society can be controlled and manipulated by pure fear. They will listen to anyone and anything to try to be safe, even if there is no danger. As long as it seems like there is danger society will blindly follow in doing whatever to become safe. Like how Trump is using people's fear of muslims being terrorists.
I believe the answer is a, connect ^^
Answer:
This chapter introduces the importance of perspective. The lament that life isn't fair runs throughout this chapter, but now a Soc also brings it forth. Cherry Valance represents the perfect life to Ponyboy. She is a good-looking cheerleader, but she states that the Socs have troubles, too. Her life appears perfect to an outsider looking in, but that apparently is not the case.
Explanation:
During Chapter 2, Pony's character is not able to see Cherry's point of view that the Socs have their own troubles. But the last sentence of the chapter, "I know better now," not only foreshadows upcoming events, but also shows Ponyboy's own personal growth. Later, he develops a better understanding of the Socs and changes his own perspective. With hindsight, in the retelling of this story, he is able to see the Socs in a different light: "I really couldn't see what Socs would have to sweat about — good grades, good cars, good girls, madras and Mustangs and Corvairs." This sentence was written in the past tense, "really couldn't see," with an implied correction of understanding. This notes a change in Ponyboy's perspective.
Answer:
Explanation:
Right Panel
The problem with this question is that there are some answers that we know nothing about. We are confined to this passage. What do we know if her age? Nothing.
To me she sounds genuine enough, if a little opaque. She says "You see, he doesn't listen to me and he doesn't take his medicine at the proper time. And above all, he lies in a position that is not good for him."
I've heard my wife say things that are quite similar. They're quite true. I never doubt her sincerity and I never question why she's saying them. Ivan is likely a terrible patient.
His conclusion a couple of sentences later is that when they left, they took all the falseness with them. Their concern means nothing to him. What does concern him is the pain and the inevitability of death. Death cannot be avoided and it cannot be enjoyed.
All the answers seem tainted to me. We don't have enough evidence to conclude what might be true of her. I truly don't know which one to pick. I will say A, but if you have a different idea, go with it.
Center Pane
You have to pick the last one. Nothing makes any sense about his state without that last sentence. It begins with "My Strength ... "
Well the second one is not that easy. I would pick anything that recognizes there is a time difference. So your second choice might be "It's all the same to them, but they will die too. Fools! I first ... "
Left Pane
I would pick A, but I have no firm conviction. Ivan is drawn into the world of weakness and pain and it is this preoccupation that almost drives him to insanity. Each day that passes makes the pain worse and the weakness a limitation. Given what we know, I'd pick A.