Answer:
Planfulness
Explanation:
Planfulness: Specially pattern of thought can change them and increase the likelihood of the achievement of the goal such as generating heuristics automate the goal-oriented present attention movement, goal-related decision making to the future to make increase the salience of a distal goal and contrasted the enjoyment related goals and progress required to complete it. It will unknown if there would be stable differences intendancy to deploy particular meta-cognition during goal pursuits. A tool to assess such differences would help to identify and intervene on a personal barrier to goal assess. Planfulness that capture the person proclivity to adapt efficient goal-related recognition in pursuits their goal
Answer:
This statement is CORRECT: <u>One can keep adding premises to inductive arguments to make them go from strong to weak, then back to strong again, etc.</u>
Explanation:
The inductive reasoning is based on how the the premises are built, in order for them to lead us to a conclusion. This is why building the right premises can lead to a week or strong argument.
The process of builing a inductive argument is based on specific observations or statements into more general aspects. Although strong premises can lead to strong arguments, they do not garantee the conclusion would be true.
In logic, inductive argument it is not classify as valid or invalid, it is strong or weak according to the premises. The premises can be testable for instance, or they can come from observation.
I think traditional cuz they do it based off of past generations
Answer:
Andrew can sue Robert for breach of contract.
Explanation:
A contract case is presented before a judge if one or both parties claim that contract has been breached.
A breach of contract is like a failure to fulfill the promise that was a part of the contract. This is in legal terms. It can allow a party to sue the other party for making a contract breach.
Robert breached the contract as he did not pay the commission on the sale of his house to the buyer. So, Andrew can sue Robert for the same.
