The US Congress acted to regulate the practices of business during the gilded age by not creating any law for the growth of monopolistic businesses.
Option A is the correct answer.
<h3>
What is a monopoly?</h3>
A monopoly is a type of economic market where there is a sole seller in respect of selling a certain kind of product with no close substitutes.
Gilded Age was the time period of increase in the economic growth of the US country from the year 1870 till the year 1900. It was the time span where the US country flourished its businesses in the large sector of the economy like factories, mining of coal, and building of railroads.
Therefore, there was no law passed for encouraging monopolistic businesses in the Glided age by the US congress.
Learn more about the glided age in the related link:
brainly.com/question/21199270
#SPJ1
1 is laws based on the quran
2 is ethnic group
As this is up to interpretation as the war hasn't progressed far enough to provide a clear answer, I am going to give the best / worst case scenario.
Best case scenario, Putin realizes that what he is doing is irrational and calls off the invasion, and Russia deals with the economic consequences.
Worst case scenario, Putin keeps pushing the war until foreign countries get involved, possibly triggering Article 5 of NATO, causing WWIII and most likely ending in nuclear war.
What I believe / hope is going to happen is that is becomes more of a cold war where there is no direct conflict outside of Ukraine and Russia / Belarus until Russia gives up.
Answer:
All men are equal and independent. All people have inalienable rights. The outlining of jobs and limited power of government. Non-government organizations tend to have wider reach in helping minorities compared to government organization. Organization such as NAACP for example, provide services to help eliminate social injustices by giving free Job agencies and law-related help for minorities. Local government in colonial America was the seedbed of American constitutionalism—a simple fact insufficiently appreciated by those writing in American political theory. Evidence for neglect can be found simply by examining any book dealing with American constitutional history and noting the absence of references to colonial documents written by Americans. Rather, at best there will be brief references to Magna Carta, perhaps the English Constitution, and probably the Declaration of Independence. If the authors of these books discuss the source of American constitutional theory beyond these few documents, they will almost inevitably mention European thinkers, John Locke being prominent among them. It is the purpose of this volume to end such neglect and reverse such attitudes.
hope this helps and feel free to put brainiest
Answer:
What does national sovereignty mean: The supreme, absolute, and uncontrollable power by which an independent state is governed and from which all specific political powers are derived; the intentional independence of a state, combined with the right and power of regulating its internal affairs without foreign interference.
Why did Americans feel that it was violated by the act of impressment: because they wanted it to be in justice.
Explanation: