Answer:
Critical Thinking
Explanation:
- Critical thinking is the ability to engage in meditative and autonomous thinking.
- This is the process to understand the logical connection between ideas.
- Identify the arguments and construct and evaluate them.
- To detect the inconsistency and common mistakes in reasoning
- To solve the problem systematically.
- To find out the relevance and importance of the ideas.
- Reflect on the justification of one's values and beliefs.
- It is not a matter of accumulating the information.
For example, a person who has much knowledge and facts not necessary to be good at critical thinking.
Critical thinking helps us acquire knowledge and improve the theories, and strengthen arguments. We can use critical thinking to enhance the work process and to improve the social institution.
the explantion is my awnser. If im not mistaken this is the diffrence between the two.
Explanation:
Civil service is performed by a civil servant who was hired by the country's government and works for the public sector. While a public servant is performed by a public servant who is a person appointed by a member of the government and serves the population and also preformes public duties.
Answer:
during closing statements
Explanation:
In court, it is up to the lawyer to uphold a thesis. Be it defense, for the defendant's benefit, or prosecution in cases where the prosecutor uses an auxiliary lawyer to make the allegations. Among the many ways a lawyer can act in certain trials, some stand out. In the case of confessed defendants, that is, those who assume the crime, the lawyer's role is to uphold the thesis of a simple homicide or to disqualify the aggression. Somehow, the professional tries to soften the client's penalty. In situations where the defendant does not confess the crimes, lawyers use the thesis of refusal of authorship, where the accused do not assume the act.
Regardless, during the closing statements of a criminal trial, attorneys should provide the final summaries of their cases to help the jury or judge recall important points of the case.
Answer:
unconditioned response (UCR).
Explanation:
Unconditioned response (UCR) -
In an organism , unconditioned response is generated from the unconditioned stimulus.
These are the cases where the organism response in a very normal and natural manner to any external or internal stimulus.
These behaviors are not taught by anyone .
Hence, from the scenario of the question, the dog's salivating was an unconditioned response (UCR) .
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Andrew has committed the tort of intentional infliction of emotional distress against Georgette.
An intentional tort is an action committed knowingly by a person which causes some form of harm to another person.
<em>Even though Andrew drove his car within inches of Michael and Georgette as a joke, i</em><em>t classifies as an intentional tort since he has caused Georgette some emotional distress.</em>
