Explanation:
they all include transfer of heat from one point to another
Answer:
Women's rights have historically been restricted by the Supreme Court using the reasonableness standard.
Explanation:
The reasonableness standard is used in US courts to understand whether a plaintiff or defendant acted reasonably in a harassment situation, for example, and it has been used in cases against police where the plaintiff claims excessive violence was used. There is also the "reasonable woman standard" that has been used in US Supreme Court Cases like Harris vs. Forklift Systems 510 US 17 (1993). The Supreme Court sided in favor of Harris who had to appeal two lower court decisions that found that Harris was not sufficiently psychologically impacted for the case to constitute harassment. The reasonableness standard can be seen as limiting because it imposes the standards of what men find reasonable in a sexual situation and coworker relationship at the expense of what women may find uncomfortable or inappropriate.
Answer: Content analysis
Explanation: It is a method for analysing different formats such as text, audio or in this case video (television), therefore, the media. So it examines, researches, analyses content on a number of aspects. There is no focus on the impression of some text or video content, which is actually an evaluation. The focus here is on exploring which phrases or words are used, which depends on the time, therefore in the spirit of the times, so as such it is variable after a number of years. That is why students who do this kind of content analysis review and compare old TV shows with today's ones. It means summarising what patterns of communication are present, that is, words, phrases, topics, and how much their representation is in communication, that is, researching the quantity of those words and phrases.
Answer:
Option D
Explanation:
The Supreme Court is the highest tier of the Judicial system which is tasked with interpreting the meaning of law in the United States or any democratic nations because such court is the final arbiter of the law, it is saddled with the task to decide whether a law is relevant to a particular set of facts, or to rule on how a law should be applied and likewise ensuring equal justice under law and, thereby, also functions as guardian and interpreter of the Constitution dealing with the interpretation of the constitution as stipulated by the framer of the constitution. So, it's of the essence to note that the legislative branch of government makes and passes laws i.e to legislate and oversight. Congress is an example of the legislature. The executive branch of government enforces laws and the bureaucracy makes regulations.
<em>According to the Constitution, the Supreme Court is saddled with the responsibility of interpreting the law</em>
Answer:
According to behaviorists, operant conditioning may play a key role in how the rewarding effects of drugs lead to substance use disorders.
Explanation:
According to Skinner, operant conditioning is a learning method that takes place employing rewards and punishments as a response to a particular behavior. Operant conditioning determines how an individual associates a specific behavior and its consequences, such as drugs consumption and its effects.