Answer:
immediately challenge the rule by filing a complaint with the administrative agency.
Explanation:
Since the new rule is affecting it's business by increasing cost andaking paperwork cumbersome, Al's Car Shack can file a complaint with the administrative agency stating it's case.
There is no dispute yet so there is no need to challenge the rule in court at this time.
If the administrative agency cannot settle with Al's Car Shack the case may go to court.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The quality should be about the same.
The social responsibility should also be about the same.
There shouldn't be side effects of most products. If you are speaking of medications, there really ought to be the same side effects with the same severity and the same statistical occurrences.
The only difference is the company selling the product.
There have been exceptions to this where different "fillers" were used in the generic brand and the side effects were different and more severe. I've only heard of one case however and I cannot remember what it was. Manufacturers were careful not to let it happen again.
Answer:
Amount of cash at the end of one year is $16,200
Explanation:
Amount invested = $15,000
Rate of return = 8%
Amount at the end of one year = $15,000 + (0.08×$15,000) = $15,000 + $1,200 = $16,200
Answer: -0.5
Explanation:
Based on the information given, the price elasticity of demand will be calculated as follows:
= dQ/dP × P/Q
where,
dQ/dP = -1
P = 100
Q = 200 – P + 25 U – 50 P beer
Q = 200 - 100 + 25(8) - 50(2)
Q = 200 - 100 + 200 - 100
Q = 200
Therefore, dQ/dP × P/Q
= -1 × (100/200)
= -1 × 1/2
= -1 × 0.5
= -0.5
The price elasticity of demand is -0.5.
To remove almost all of the sodium and minerals
