The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Some historians have argued that the American Revolution was not revolutionary in nature. Instead of fostering revolutionary change, it maintained continuity.
I think that the American Revolution was a genuine revolutionary movement stemmed from the anger and desperation of the American colonists that suffered many grievances from the British government.
The 13 American colonies had to pay heavy taxation such as the Navigation Acts, the Stamp Acts, the Tea Act. The worst part was that Colonists did not have any voice or representation in the English Parliament.
That is why colonists created secret groups such as the Sons of Liberty and people like Samuel Adams united other colonists against the English crown.
It is true that there were also some particular agendas inside the revolutionary movement, specifically, economic ones. But in essence, for me, it was a true independence movement.
Explanation:
The war lasted from 1618 to 1648, starting as a battle among the Catholic and Protestant states that formed the Holy Roman Empire. ... In the end, the conflict changed the geopolitical face of Europe and the role of religion and nation-states in society.
A contributing factor to louis XIV's power was creating a standing army
It gives the people the right to be safe and secure in their homes and prevents things such as illegal seizures or entry by government officials or searches without warrants or anything similar that might be considered to be against basic human rights and against the 4th amendment.
Hmmm probably republican Bc they helped free the slaves or sum like that
