The function that is graphed is...
B.) y = |x - 3| - 4
Since the lines "|" in the function make it a V shape.
And when you graph the one point where the the 2 lines meet it is.
(-3, -4)
So this answer is correct. :P
Good Luck! :)
9514 1404 393
Answer:
9n^4
Step-by-step explanation:
The divisor and quotient can be interchanged to find the divisor:
![\dfrac{18n^6+27n^5-36n^4}{2n^2+3n-4}=\boxed{\text{Blank 1}}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%7B18n%5E6%2B27n%5E5-36n%5E4%7D%7B2n%5E2%2B3n-4%7D%3D%5Cboxed%7B%5Ctext%7BBlank%201%7D%7D)
Such division is carried out by first finding the quotient of the highest-degree terms:
![\dfrac{18n^6}{2n^2}=\dfrac{18}{2}n^{6-2}=9n^4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdfrac%7B18n%5E6%7D%7B2n%5E2%7D%3D%5Cdfrac%7B18%7D%7B2%7Dn%5E%7B6-2%7D%3D9n%5E4)
This value is used to multiply the denominator and subtract that product from the numerator to find the new numerator. The new numerator is zero, so the value that goes in Blank 1 is ...
9n^4
_____
The attachment shows the long division.
Answer:
7*7*7
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
One: 58.5
Two 36.6
Step-by-step explanation:
One
20 students * 65 = 1300 This is the total score of all 20 students. They may not all get 65, but 1300 is what their average total is.
20 students * 52 = 1040
The total score of all 40 students was 1300 + 1040 = 2340
The average for the entire class was 2340 / 40 = 58.5
Two
This question is done almost the same way.
Supposes the total number of members is 100. That means that 28 of them are men
28 * 33 = 924 This is the total age for the men
100 - 28 = 72 Out of 100, 72 of the people there are women.
72 * 38 = 2736
The total number of years of all of the members is
924 + 2736 = 3660
The average age of all members is 3660/100 = 36.6
Why did I pick 100 as the total membership? It is because a percentage is number out of 100. Am I allowed to invent things like that? Sure. I'm just using the definition of a percentage.
The average will make it come out the same.
The volume, surface area and the ratios of the SA to volume will be as follows:
Volume=πr²h
Area=2πr²+πdh
Ratio of SA to volume=Area/volume
π=3.14
Thus using the above formula:
1.
a]
Radius: 3 inches
Height: 2 inches
Volume=πr²h
volume=π×3²×2=56.52 in³
b]
Area=2πr²+πdh
2×π×3²+π×2×3×2
=56.55+37.68
=94.23 in²
c]
Ratio=area/volume
=94.23/56.52
=1.6672
1.
Radius: 2 inches
Height: 9 inches
a]
V=πr²h
V=3.14*2^2*9
V=113.04 in³
b]
Area=2πr²+πdh
=2*3.14*2^2+3.14*2*2*9
=25.12+113.04
=138.16 in²
c]
Ratio=area/volume
=138.16/113.04
=11/9
3.
Diameter=4 inches
Height= 9 inches
a]
V=πr²h
V=3.14×2²×9
V=113.04
b]
Area=2πr²+πdh
=2*3.14*2^2+3.14*4*9
=25.12+113.04
=138.16 in²
c]
Ratio=area/volume
=138.16/113.04
=11/9
4]
Diameter: 6 inches
Height: 4 inches
a]
Volume=πr²h
=3.14×3²×4
=113.04 in³
b]
Area=2πr²+πdh
=2×3.14×3²+3.14×6×4
=56.52+75.36
=131.88 in²
c] Ratio
131.88/113.04
=7/6
1. For the surface area to volume to be small it means that the area is smaller than the volume, for surface area to volume be larger it means that the surface area is larger than the volume. It is more economical for the surface area to volume to be small because it will mean that small amount of materials make cans with large volume. This means cost of production is cheaper.
2. To evaluate this process let's use one of the dimensions:
Radius: 3 inches
Height: 2 inches:
i. add radius and height:
3+2=5 inches
ii. Multiply radius and height:
3×2=6
iii. Dividing the result from step 1 by the result in step 2:
5/6
iv. Multiply the result from step 3 by 2:
5/6×6
=5
This result does not seem to add up to the result in our earlier ratio. Thus we conclude that Khianna was wrong. This method can't work with 3-D figures.