<span>75 kilograms
The equation given for BSA doesn't look correct, perhaps due to formatting issues involving a simple copy and paste without any proofreading afterwards. Doing a quick google search gives the Mosteller formula for BSA which is:
BSA = sqrt(W*H/3600)
This formula is quite likely the original target of the copy and paste since it has all of the correct values and it's likely that the square root symbol wasn't properly pasted, nor the horizontal bar indicating division. So I'll use the Mosteller formula in solving this problem:
First, solve for W, then substitute the known values and calculate:
BSA = sqrt(W*H/3600)
BSA^2 = W*H/3600
3600*BSA^2 = W*H
3600*BSA^2/H = W
3600*1.96^2/185 = W
3600*3.8416/185 = W
74.755 = W
So the weight of the adult is 75 kilograms.
If the incorrectly copied equation of Bâ˘Sâ˘A=Hâ‹…W3600 were to be used and if the missing operator between the W and the 3600 were a divide symbol, the calculated value would be 38 kg, which is rather light for someone 185 cm tall since the low end of healthy is 65 kg. And if the missing operator between the W and 3600 was a multiply, then the calculated weight would be 3 micrograms which is way too small for a human being, no matter how starved. However, the value calculated using the Mosteller formula would represent a BMI of 22 which is about average for a normal healthy adult.</span>
Answer:
5 doses of medication and 1000ml
Answer:
(x - 4)(x - 4)
x = 4
Step-by-step explanation:
x² - 8x + 16
= (x - 4)(x - 4)
x - 4 = 0
x = 4
The fourth or the D) Option is correct.
To find the new induced matrix via a scalar quantified multiplication we have to multiply the scalar quantity with each element surrounded and provided in a composed (In this case) 3×3 or three times three matrix comprising 3 columns and 3 rows for each element which is having a valued numerical in each and every position.
Multiply the scalar quantity with each element with respect to its row and column positioning that is,
Row × Column. So;
(1 × 1) × 7, (2 × 1) × 7, (3 × 1) × 7, (1 × 2) × 7, (2 × 2) × 7, (3 × 2) × 7, (1 × 3) × 7, (2 × 3) × 7 and (3 × 3) × 7. This will provide the final answer, that is, the D) Option.
To interpret and make it more interesting in LaTeX form. Here is the solution with LaTeX induced matrix.




Hope it helps.
Answer:
(8, - 5 )
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the 2 equations
3x + 4y = 4 → (1)
- x - 3y = 7 → (2)
Multiplying (2) by 3 and adding to (1) will eliminate the x- term.
- 3x - 9y = 21 → (3)
Add (1) and (3) term by term to eliminate x, that is
0 - 5y = 25
- 5y = 25 ( divide both sides by - 5 )
y = - 5
Substitute y = - 5 into either of the 2 equations and solve for x
Substituting into (1)
3x + 4(- 5) = 4
3x - 20 = 4 ( add 20 to both sides )
3x = 24 ( divide both sides by 3 )
x = 8
solution is (8, - 5 )