Land use like how Americans have built railroads and that?
The answer is A. I hope this helps
Answer:
The statement which is the best argument against Social Darwinism is:
B. A good work ethic can eliminate a lot of the disadvantages of poverty.
Explanation:
Social Darwinism is a philosophy that incorporates notions taken from Darwinism, applying them to sciences such as sociology and economics. As we know, <u>Darwinism is based on the idea of "survival of the fittest". Therefore, Social Darwinism explains differences in status, wealth, and success by stating that those who have those things are better than those who do not. In other words, if someone is poor or unsuccessful, that means that person is not "evolved" enough.</u>
The problem with Social Darwinism is that is justifies discrimination and imperialism. It places the blame on those who are actually suffering the consequences of a broken and unfair system. With that in mind, we can easily eliminate options A and C, since they agree with Social Darwinism. Option D can also be eliminated because it merely states a fact that is true, but does not refute Social Darwinism.<u> Letter B is the best option. It argues that there is a way to eliminate many of the disadvantages, that is, it shows the problem with the system, refuting Social Darwinism.</u>
In an airship
hope this helps.
Answer:
D. Dominant traits will be expressed if one dominant allelle is present.
Explanation: Lets say T (tall) was dominant over t (short) If the phenotypes are Tt or TT (where a dominant allelle is present in both) the dominant trait of tallness is expressed. However if there is no dominant allele and the phenotype was tt, the offspring would be short and so the dominant trait wouldn't be expressed.
