Answer:
Conservation groups and government, i'm pretty sure it's this one.
Explanation:
Answer:
Used an analogy to solve his problem
Explanation:
Analogy is the Congnitive process of transferring information from a particular subject which is regarded as the source to another particular subject which is the target. It is the transference of information gotten from a similar task to the work at hand in order to help achieve the same result just as Terry did for the cake.
Answer:
d. relies on a sample that is too small to represent the entire corporate workforce
Explanation:
the conclusion is suspect because a 100 employee in a single corporation is too small to represent the entire corporate workforce. Larger sample size involving more than one corporation will be more representative than using a single corporation, the study is not random.
Option A is wrong because it was never stated by the researcher that corporate employees are more sleep deprived than other people.
Option C is wrong because the effect of sleep deprivation is out of the scope of the study.
Option B is also wrong because the evidence provided is statistically possible.
Everyday objects that are designed to be distinguished from objects of the same design will do <u>Stand out
.</u>
<u>
Explanation:</u>
The principle of repetition basically implies the reusing of the equivalent or comparative components all through your structure. Reiteration of certain plan components in a structure will bring an away from of solidarity, consistency, and cohesiveness. Reiteration can be customary or unpredictable and even or lopsided.
The gestalt standard of similitude says that components that are comparable are seen to be more related than components that are disparate. Likeness encourages us to arrange protests by their relatedness to different articles inside a gathering and can be influenced by the characteristics of shading, size, shape, and direction. It tends to be whatever a peruses will outwardly perceive.
The chronological order of how events led to modern-day restrictions on voting rights is:
- After Reconstruction, discriminatory voting laws are passed that disenfranchise people based on race.
- The Voting Rights Act of 1965 requires federal oversight of voting rights in districts with a history of discrimination.
- More African Americans, Native Americans, Latinos, and Asian Americans vote and are elected to office.
- The Supreme Court rules in Shelby v. Holder that criteria to determine which districts need federal oversight are no longer valid.
- States again begin passing laws to restrict voting rights.
<h3>What is the history of voting rights in U.S.?</h3>
After the Reconstruction that came with the end of the Civil War, Southern States enacted laws aimed at keeping minority groups from voting.
These laws were overcome with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 and more minority groups like African and Latino Americans were able to vote and get into office.
With the Supreme Court ruling in Shelby v. Holder in 2013 however, states began imposing restrictions again and especially in minority districts.
Find out more on voting rights in the U.S. at brainly.com/question/582433.
