Answer:
Explanation:
1. Otonomi dalam manajemen pada dasarnya berarti memberikan banyak kebebasan untuk membuat pilihan di tempat kerja. Seorang manajer yang memberikan otonomi karyawan biasanya menguraikan tujuan suatu proyek tetapi memungkinkan karyawan untuk memutuskan cara terbaik untuk mencapai tujuan itu.
2. Otonomi daerah memiliki keunggulan dalam memberikan kewenangan kebijaksanaan dan inovasi kepada daerah, memungkinkan perwakilan yang lebih besar dalam proses pengaturan daerah, dan membangun keadilan hukum yang lebih baik. Kelemahan ini memicu penyimpangan oleh kepala daerah sehingga mereka terseret ke dalam kasus hukum, dan memperbesar potensi konflik kewenangan antara pemerintah pusat dan pemerintah daerah
3.
Ada dua aliran utama penelitian yang mengevaluasi hubungan antara manusia
praktik dan kinerja sumber daya. Yang pertama adalah universalisme atau "praktik terbaik"
pendekatan. Mereka yang menggunakan pendekatan ini menunjuk ke temuan dukungan berulang untuk menunjukkan
bahwa beberapa praktik SDM, seperti intensitas perekrutan, peluang karier internal,
penilaian kinerja, sistem pelatihan formal, pembagian keuntungan, dan kompensasi insentif
didokumentasikan dengan sangat baik dalam berbagai konteks untuk menunjukkan bahwa ada universalitasnya
A person who believes an agency has violated his or her userra rights may file a complaint with the veterans employment and training service in the department of the Secretary of Labor.
<h3>What is the secretary of labor department?</h3>
In the United States of America, the secretary of labor is the office that is responsible for the overseeing and the management of all functions that pertains to labor in the country.
This person is one that is also in charge of the laws that are made with respect to labor in the nation.
He has to work closely with unions and other labor parastatals to take care of the issues that have to do with workers and their employees and the relationships in the workplace.
Read more on labor here :
brainly.com/question/881501
#SPJ1
Answer:
Criminal law is the most ancient branch of the law. Many wise observers have tried to define and explain it, but the explanations often include many complex and subtle distinctions. A traditional criminal law course would include a lot of discussions on criminal intent, the nature of criminal versus civil responsibility, and the constitutional rights accorded the accused. But in this chapter, we will consider only the most basic aspects of intent, responsibility, and constitutional rights.
Unlike civil actions, where plaintiffs seek compensation or other remedies for themselves, crimes involve “the state” (the federal government, a state government, or some subunit of state government). This is because crimes involve some “harm to society” and not just harm to certain individuals. But “harm to society” is not always evident in the act itself. For example, two friends of yours at a party argue, take the argument outside, and blows are struck; one has a bloody nose and immediately goes home. The crimes of assault and battery have been committed, even though no one else knows about the fight and the friends later make up. By contrast, suppose a major corporation publicly announces that it is closing operations in your community and moving operations to Southeast Asia. There is plenty of harm to society as the plant closes down and no new jobs take the place of the company’s jobs. Although the effects on society are greater in the second example, only the first example is a crime.
Crimes are generally defined by legislatures, in statutes; the statutes describe in general terms the nature of the conduct they wish to criminalize. For government punishment to be fair, citizens must have clear notice of what is criminally prohibited. Ex post facto laws—laws created “after the fact” to punish an act that was legal at the time—are expressly prohibited by the US Constitution. Overly vague statutes can also be struck down by courts under a constitutional doctrine known as “void for vagueness.”
Answer:
1. Investigating any situation threatening international peace;
2. Recommending procedures for peaceful resolution of a dispute;
3. Calling upon other member nations to completely or partially interrupt economic relations as well as sea, air, postal, and radio communications, or to sever diplomatic relations; and
4. Enforcing its decisions militarily, if necessary.
Explanation:
Sorry, I only know 4 of them
