Answer:
George W. Bush reacted well to the threat by standing up for the Americans and saying that the U.S power has lost credibility with the terrorists.
Answer:
Japan's family dynamics have historically been defined by a two-person, female housewife or caregiver role and a male income-earner role, a historically common division of labor between the sexes. After Japan's involvement in World War II ended, the resulting Japanese Constitution included Article 24, "the Gender Equality Clause," which was introduced to steer the country towards gender equality. However, deeply-embedded family and gender norms led to resistance among citizens, and the culture remained largely the same as of 2009.
It was not until the mid-1970s that Japanese women began to play a larger role in the paid economy. Japanese men, however, generally did not step in to play a larger role in the house. Studies have shown that there is a negative correlation between the number of hours worked by fathers in their jobs and the amount of housework (including childcare) that the father provides.After paid work, the father would come home, spending most of his time eating or in non-social interactions such as watching TV with his family.This led to the term "Japan Inc.," synonymous with males committing their life to their job while in a long-term relationship.
Another term that became popular in Japan was the "relationship-less society", describing how men's long work hours left little or no time for them to bond with their families. Japanese society came to be one of isolation within the household, since there was only enough time after work to care for oneself, excluding the rest of the family. This held especially true for families who wished to have a second child. Due to corporations and work regulation laws, men of all ages in large firms are forced to prioritize work over the rest of their life. The limited amount of help from their male spouses leaves women with the majority of household chores.
Explanation:
Basically, they're forced to stay at home, they have huge wage gaps, their health care is way worse than men's. If r*pe is accused, they never believe the women. etc.
<h2>Answer and Explanation </h2>
The laws were intended to punish the Massachusetts colonists for their resistance in the Tea Party objection in response to variations in assessment by the British to the loss of dependent assets. In Great Britain, these laws were introduced as Coercive Actions.
Parliament assessed the colonists. The colonists didn't like assessment without description. The colonists held having objections facing charges which drive to the Boston Tea Party. The British desired the colonists to send England behind for all the tea that the colonists killed during the Boston Tea Party.
<span> Domestic </span><span>policies
</span><span>Vietnamization
</span>
