After reading the video transcript we can say Dr. X is convincing because he supports his explanation with facts, as stated in option B and explained below.
<h3>Why is Dr. X effective and convincing?</h3>
In the video "Dr. X and the Quest for Food Safety," Dr. X is effective at communicating the dangers of cross contamination. The reason for that is the fact that he supports his explanation with facts, that is, he provides evidence that proves his explanation right.
With the information above in mind, we can say Dr. X is convincing when he talks about how bacteria function and what can be done to prevent contamination. Option B is the correct answer.
The complete question with the answer choices can be found attached.
Learn more about food safety here:
brainly.com/question/934835
#SPJ1
Answer:
I think it is c but I am not positive
Explanation:
I know it is not a or b because if you have ever read gift of the magi you will understand that this has nothing to do with the underlying conflict. I believe it to be c because if you once again have ever read the short story she is very upset because she can't get a great gift for her husband.
Please let me know if this helped or not
Noun ,pronoun,gerund or clause the "object" of the preposition.
Answer:
We were at a disadvantage <em><u>in</u></em><em> </em>that that we weren't too familiar with the language the others were using.
Explanation:
In the given sentence, the correct preposition to be used is "in". This is because "in" will introduce the argument or provide an explanation for the statement before the blank.
With the use of "in", the statement <em>"we weren't too familiar with the language the others were using"</em> provides an explanation for the first statement <em>"[W]e were at a disadvantage"</em>. Whereas the use of the prepositions "by", "with", and "for" are incorrect.
Thus, the correct answer is "in".
Answer:
author explains how she learnt about life's uncertainty and how things can change easily.
Explanation:
In the "Early Dismissal" by Robin Wasserman, the author explains how she learnt about life's uncertainty and how things change easily at a very young age. She tells about how her innocence had blindfolded her about people's commitment and friendship.
Being a shy and passive person, the author says that she always treasured that one best friend she had during childhood. The author compares herself with Anne from 'Anne of the Green Cables', a fictional character who treasures bonds, friendships and partnerships wholeheartedly.
So when she finds out that her best friend doesn't regard her the same way like she does, her whole fascination and imagination of 'kindred spirits' shatters and gets broken. She then compares this experience of how grown-ups deal with life and how things can change anytime.
However, in the end, the author adds that she still believes in the idea of forever. Giving the readers a sense of how she is still innocent deep down inside.
