Frequently lacks effective communication channels across departments. Communication between departments can be an issue in this structure.
Answer and Explanation:
The computation is shown below:
1. Overhead rates
For Molding Deptt
= Total Estimated overhead ÷ Total Machine hours
= $400,000 ÷ 5,000
= $80 per machine hour
For Polishing Deptt
= Total Estimated overhead ÷ Total Labor hours
= $80,000 ÷ 20,000
= $4 per machine hour
2. Overheads assigned to Form A is
= (80 × 3500) + (4 × 5000)
= $300,000
Overheads assigned to Form B is
= (80 × 1500) + (4 × 15000)
= $180,000
Now
Overhead cost per unit
Form A = $300,000 ÷ 30,000 = $10 per unit
Form B = $180,000 ÷ 50,000 = $3.6 per unit
In order to properly tackle this problem, we must understand the relationship between the nominal annual rate and real (effective) annual rate.
To do this:
-First you take the nominal rate, divide by the number of times it's compounded (converted) per year.
-Then, add one to that number, and raise that number to the power of how many times you compound per year.
Here is the method in practice:
First 3 Years:
Nominal rate= 2% ÷ 12 times/yr = 0.001667
Effective rate = 1.001667 ^12 = 1.020184
Next 2 Years (Discounting)
3% ÷ 2/yr = .015
1.015 ^ 2 = 1.061364
Next 4 years (Interest)
.042 ÷ .5 (once every 2 years) = .084
1.084 ^ (1/2) = 1.041153
The last 3 years are already expressed as an effective rate, so we don't need to convert them. The annual rate is:
1.058
I kept the 1 in the numbers (1.058 instead of 5.8% for example) so that it's easier to find the final number
Take every relevant number and raise it to the power of the number of years it's compounded for. For discounting, raise it to a negative power.
First 3 years: 1.020184 ^ 3 = 1.061784
Next 2 years: 1.030225 ^ -2 = .942184
Next 4 years: 1.041163 ^ 4 = 1.175056
Last 3 years: 1.058 ^ -3 = .84439
Multiply these numbers (include all decimals when you do this calculation)
1.062 * .942 * 1.175 * .844 = .992598
This is our final multiplier to find the effect on our principal:
.992598 * 2,480 = 2461.64
Answer is 2461.64
Answer:
The elasticity of labor is elastic (low elastic).
Explanation:
The given situation or condition, the rise in minimum wage will lead to decrease the employment for the person who earns lower than new minimum wage shows that the labor demand is elastic or elasticity for the labor is low because the increase in the minimum wage lead discourages to the producer to hire unskilled labor. Therefore, employment will decrease with an increase in the minimum wage.
When a tax distorts incentives to buyers and sellers so that fewer goods are produced and sold, the tax has caused a deadweight loss.
<h3>What is meant by deadweight loss?</h3>
- The gap between the production and consumption of any given good or service, including taxes, is referred to as deadweight loss in economics. Deadweight loss is most frequently detected when the quantity generated compared to the quantity consumed deviates from the ideal surplus concentration.
- Overproduction of commodities results in a loss of money. For instance, a baker might only sell 80 of the 100 loaves of bread they produce. There will be a deadweight loss since the 20 remaining loaves will become moldy and dry, and they will need to be thrown away.
- The loss in economic activity that results when the market pricing of products or services change negatively affects consumers and businesses is referred to as deadweight loss.
- You need to know the change in price and the change in quantity demanded in order to compute deadweight loss. Deadweight Loss is calculated using the following formula:. 5 * (P2 - P1) * (Q1 - Q2).
When a tax distorts incentives to buyers and sellers so that fewer goods are produced and sold, the tax has caused a deadweight loss.
To learn more about deadweight loss, refer to:
brainly.com/question/21335704
#SPJ4
